Advertisement
Perspective

Perspective The Perspective section provides experts with a forum to comment on topical or controversial issues of broad interest.

See all article types »

Two Years Later: Journals Are Not Yet Enforcing the ARRIVE Guidelines on Reporting Standards for Pre-Clinical Animal Studies

  • David Baker,

    Affiliation: Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

    X
  • Katie Lidster mail,

    katielidster@hotmail.com

    Affiliation: Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

    X
  • Ana Sottomayor,

    Affiliations: Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, Escola de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal

    X
  • Sandra Amor

    Affiliations: Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, Pathology Department, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    X
  • Published: January 07, 2014
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756
  • Featured in PLOS Collections

Media Coverage of this Article

Found additional news media or blog coverage for the article? Please let us know.

Linked Articles

Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable?

Jonathan A. Eisen, Emma Ganley, Catriona J. MacCallum
Editorial | published 7 Jan 2014 | PLOS Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757