Advertisement
Research Article

Quantitative Control of Protein S-Palmitoylation Regulates Meiotic Entry in Fission Yeast

  • Mingzi M. Zhang,

    Affiliation: Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Pei-Yun Jenny Wu,

    Affiliation: Laboratory of Yeast Genetics and Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America

    Current address: Institute of Genetics and Development of Rennes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 6290, Rennes, France.

    X
  • Felice D. Kelly,

    Affiliation: Laboratory of Yeast Genetics and Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Paul Nurse,

    Affiliation: Laboratory of Yeast Genetics and Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America

    Current address: The Royal Society, London, United Kingdom.

    X
  • Howard C. Hang mail

    hhang@rockefeller.edu

    Affiliation: Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Published: July 02, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597

Abstract

Protein S-palmitoylation, a lipid modification mediated by members of the palmitoyltransferase family, serves as an important membrane-targeting mechanism in eukaryotes. Although changes in palmitoyltransferase expression are associated with various physiological and disease states, how these changes affect global protein palmitoylation and cellular function remains unknown. Using a bioorthogonal chemical reporter and labeling strategy to identify and analyze multiple cognate substrates of a single Erf2 palmitoyltransferase, we demonstrate that control of Erf2 activity levels underlies the differential modification of key substrates such as the Rho3 GTPase in vegetative and meiotic cells. We show further that modulation of Erf2 activity levels drives changes in the palmitoylome as cells enter meiosis and affects meiotic entry. Disruption of Erf2 function delays meiotic entry, while increasing Erf2 palmitoyltransferase activity triggers aberrant meiosis in sensitized cells. Erf2-induced meiosis requires the function of the Rho3 GTPase, which is regulated by its palmitoylation state. We propose that control of palmitoyltransferase activity levels provides a fundamental mechanism for modulating palmitoylomes and cellular functions.

Author Summary

Palmitoylation is a fatty acid modification, which increases the hydrophobicity of proteins, known to control the membrane trafficking and function of many proteins important for cellular homeostasis and disease. Being a reversible process, palmitoylation is proposed to be a major cellular regulator. While changes in global protein palmitoylation patterns are often associated with different physiological states, the mechanisms that regulate this posttranslational modification and their functional consequences have been elusive. Using improved methods for protein palmitoylation analysis in the genetically tractable fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we discovered that the global protein palmitoylation pattern is significantly altered and correlates with entry into meiosis, a major developmental transition. We further showed that the precise level of a palmitoylating enzyme is important to shape the subset of lipid-modified proteins and influence the start of this cellular transition. As palmitoylated proteins are involved in eukaryotic cellular pathways, our results provide a crucial insight into how the quantitative control of palmitoylating enzymes may impact human physiology and disease.

Introduction

In eukaryotic cells, posttranslational protein S-palmitoylation (hereafter referred to as palmitoylation) regulates protein-membrane associations as well as protein targeting and trafficking. The covalent addition of palmitic acid to cysteine residues is vital for the function of key signaling factors in diverse cellular processes including immune and neuronal signaling [1][3]. With its potential for reversibility [4], which is unique among the characterized lipid modifications, palmitoylation allows both spatial and temporal control of protein function.

Given its versatility, palmitoylation is poised to be a major cellular regulator akin to phosphorylation [5]. Indeed, growing evidence suggests that protein palmitoylation is actively regulated. For example, receptor activity-regulated palmitate turnover of PSD-95 modulates synaptic strength and plasticity in postsynaptic neurons by mediating receptor clustering [6],[7]. Other extracellular signals have also been shown to alter the palmitoylation state or palmitate turnover rate of individual proteins in different cell types [8][11]. Additionally, a broader level of control is suggested by global changes in palmitoylomes associated with specific physiological states of the cell or organism [12],[13]. While protein interactions that affect substrate accessibility have been shown to affect the palmitoylation state of specific substrates [14], the biochemical and genetic mechanisms that globally shape cellular palmitoylomes in response to physiological cues have remained elusive.

Protein palmitoylation is catalyzed by the Asp-His-His-Cys (DHHC)-containing palmitoyltransferases (hereafter referred to as palmitoyltransferases) [15][17]. One of the first palmitoyltransferases discovered, ERF2 (Effectors of Ras Function 2), was identified from a budding yeast screen designed to uncover cellular regulators of Ras palmitoylation [16]. Together, ERF2 (YLR246W) and its accessory protein ERF4 (YOL110W) form a functional palmitoyltransferase complex that catalyzes palmitate transfer to Ras [17][19]. Members of this palmitoyltransferase family are responsible for most protein palmitoylation events [20], and orthologs of these integral membrane enzymes with their characteristic DHHC motif that is required for palmitoyltransferase activity have been found in all examined eukaryotic genomes. In addition to having both distinct and overlapping substrate specificities [20][22], palmitoyltransferases exhibit varying intracellular localization and tissue-specific expression [23],[24]. Misregulated expression of specific palmitoyltransferases in mammals is associated with various developmental defects [25],[26], neurological disorders [27],[28], and cancers [29],[30]. Yet despite their central roles in transferring palmitate to proteins, to date there is little evidence for regulation of palmitoyltransferases, and the roles of these enzymes in shaping global protein palmitoylation in physiological contexts remain largely unexplored.

To investigate how palmitoyltransferase regulation affects global protein palmitoylation in a physiological context, we integrated genetic and chemical tools in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and show that quantitative control of protein palmitoylation by varying Erf2 palmitoyltransferase activity levels shapes the palmitoylome during meiosis. We further demonstrate that palmitoyltransferase level-mediated changes in substrate palmitoylation affect meiotic entry in fission yeast cells, highlighting the physiological relevance of this regulatory mechanism for global protein palmitoylation.

Results

Changes in Global Protein Palmitoylation Are Associated with Meiosis

Fission yeast cells normally proliferate in the haploid state, but when nutrients become limiting, cells may enter an alternate meiotic differentiation pathway: cells of opposite mating types conjugate to form a diploid zygote, which replicates its genome and then undergoes two successive nuclear divisions to yield four haploid nuclei that mature into spores (Figure S1A). We took advantage of a well-characterized system in fission yeast for inducing synchronous meiosis that uses a temperature-sensitive allele of the Pat1 meiotic repressor (SPBC19C2.05), pat1-114 [31][33]. Diploid cells harboring this mutation can be induced to undergo meiosis in a timely and predictable manner by shifting the cultures from a permissive to restrictive temperature, resulting in the formation of viable spores (Figures S1B and 1A,B).

To analyze global changes in the palmitoylome during meiosis, we employed an alkyne-functionalized palmitate chemical reporter, alk-16, which together with bioorthogonal labeling offers significantly improved fluorescent detection of the modification compared to conventional radiolabeled lipids (Figure S2A–D) [4],[8],[34],[35]. Using this system in diploid cells undergoing synchronous meiosis, we observed a distinct meiotic palmitoylome with a prominent band at approximately 23 kDa, which was absent in vegetative cells (Figure 1C). This prompted us to focus on identifying the enzymes responsible for these modifications. Given that appearance of the meiotic palmitoylome followed the striking increase in Erf2 protein levels (Figure 1C), which reflects the reported erf2 transcription profile during meiosis [36],[37], we postulated that the DHHC-containing Erf2 protein (SPBC3H7.09) plays a critical role in orchestrating meiosis-specific protein palmitoylation.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Use of chemical reporter strategy reveals changes in global protein palmitoylation during meiosis in fission yeast.

(A) Schematic representation of fission yeast sexual differentiation. Haploid cells conjugate to form a diploid zygote, which undergoes meiosis to yield four haploid nuclei that matures into spores. Pat1 kinase is a general repressor of meiosis. For more details on S. pombe meiosis, see Figure S1. (B) Percentage of cells with 1, 2, or >2 nuclei were determined by counting ≥200 DAPI-stained cells of the indicated strains at hourly intervals after meiotic induction (top). Representative DAPI images of cells at indicated times (bottom). Scale bars, 10 µm. Synchronous meiosis in diploid pat1-114/pat1-114 cells was induced by shifting nitrogen-starved cultures to restrictive temperature (see Materials and Methods). Indicated times refer to the elapsed time after temperature shift. (C) Fluorescence profile of palmitoylated substrates in erf2-HA3/erf2-HA3 pat1-114/pat1-114 and erf2Δ/erf2Δ pat1-114/pat1-114 cells undergoing synchronized meiosis (top panel). At the indicated times after meiotic induction, aliquots of the culture were pulse-labeled with alk-16. Western blots were probed for tubulin and HA (middle and bottom panels). (D) qPCR analysis of erf2 and erf4 transcripts, normalized to act1 mRNA levels, in vegetative (Veg) and meiotic (Mei, 8 h after meiotic induction) pat1-114/pat1-114 cells. Data represent mean values of three biological repeats ± SD.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.g001

The Erf2 Palmitoyltransferase Drives Changes in the Palmitoylome During Meiosis

Of the five open reading frames in the fission yeast genome that encode for proteins containing the DHHC motif, a characteristic feature of palmitoyltransferases (Figure S3A), we focused on Erf2 whose strongly elevated expression during meiosis precedes the appearance of the meiotic palmitoylome (Figures 1D and S3B) [36],[37]. By in-gel fluorescence, we showed that Erf2 and its cofactor Erf4 (SPAC3F10.07c), and not the other DHHC-containing proteins examined, are specifically required for the incorporation of alk-16 onto Ras1 (SPAC17H9.09c) (Figure 2A), the only reported palmitoylated protein in S. pombe whose modification is important for pheromone signaling [38]. Incorporation of alk-16 directly requires Erf2 palmitoyltransferase activity, as the Ras1 palmitoylation defect in erf2Δ cells is rescued by re-introduction of Erf2, but not a catalytically inactive DHHC→DHHA mutant (Figure 2B) [39]. Collectively, these experiments demonstrate that Erf2 and Erf4 are functional orthologs of the S. cerevisiae ERF2 and ERF4 palmitoyltransferase subunits, respectively [17][19], and that this method can be used to profile Erf2-Erf4 substrates in fission yeast.

thumbnail

Figure 2. The Erf2–Erf4 palmitoyltransferase drives major changes in the meiotic palmitoylome during meiosis.

(A–B) Alk-16-associated fluorescence of immunopurified Ras1 from vegetatively growing cells with the indicated palmitoyltransferase deletions (top panels). Western blots are probed for Ras1 (bottom panels). Wild-type (DHHC) or catalytically inactive (DHHA) Erf2 was expressed from a thiamine-repressible promoter in erf2Δ cells (B). (C) Fluorescence detection of palmitoylated substrates (top panel) and Ras1 palmitoylation (bottom panel) in homozygous diploid pat1-114/pat1-114 cells with the indicated palmitoyltransferase deletions 8 h after meiotic induction. Ctrl, DMSO control; Veg, vegetative cells.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.g002

To determine whether Erf2-Erf4 palmitoyltransferase function has an impact on the meiotic palmitoylome, we profiled palmitoylated proteins in mutant diploid cells undergoing synchronous meiosis. The distinct meiotic palmitoylome requires Erf2 activity, as modification of those prominent substrates was not observed in either meiotic erf2Δ or erf4Δ cells (Figure 2C). Ras1 was also palmitoylated in an Erf2-Erf4-dependent manner in this context (Figure 2C), suggesting a role for Ras1 in meiosis [40]. Since salient features of the meiotic palmitoylome were still observed in the absence of two other putative palmitoyltransferases examined, we concluded that Erf2-Erf4 is the primary palmitoyltransferase driving changes in protein palmitoylation during meiosis.

This system, in which palmitoyltransferase regulation is linked to a highly coordinated biological process, provides an excellent model for studying how control of palmitoyltransferase expression affects global protein palmitoylation and its functional consequences.

Differential Palmitoylation of Erf2 Substrates in Distinct Cellular States

To study how control of palmitoyltransferase expression affects palmitoylation of its substrates, we sought to identify the Erf2 substrates that are preferentially palmitoylated during meiosis by comparative proteomics. We affinity purified alk-16-labeled proteins in meiotic erf2+, vegetative erf2+, and meiotic erf2Δ cells using a cleavable azido-biotin affinity tag (Figure S4A–C) [41]. Recovered proteins were subsequently identified by gel-based proteomics, and those with ≥2-fold spectral counts in alk-16 samples compared to the corresponding DMSO controls were further analyzed. Proteins enriched in meiotic erf2+ cells were subjected to two filter criteria, excluding those also enriched in (1) meiotic erf2Δ cells and (2) vegetative erf2+ cells (Figure 3A). Notably, Ras1 was excluded because it was equally recovered in both meiotic and vegetative erf2+ cells, consistent with our biochemical analyses (Figure 2B,C). Of the 238 remaining candidates (Table S2), we focused on Isp3 (SPAC1F8.05) and Rho3 (SPAC23C4.08) as they were the most highly enriched proteins with molecular weights matching the prominent ~23 kDa band we previously observed (Figures 3B and S4D). Isp3, an abundant protein involved in spore formation with meiosis-specific expression (Figure 3D) [42],[43], was the most heavily modified species: the ~23 kDa band was lost in isp3Δ cells, and HA3-tagging of Isp3 reduced the electrophoretic mobility of the major fluorescent band (Figure 3C). We further confirmed that Rho3, a Rho GTPase involved in polarized growth in vegetative cells [44],[45], is also an Erf2 substrate (Figure 3E) that is differentially modified between meiotic and vegetative cells (Figure 3F). These results suggest a novel mechanism by which changes in the palmitoylome can be mediated by the regulation of a single palmitoyltransferase activity. Given that Erf2 expression is low in vegetative cells and high in meiotic cells (Figure 1D), we reasoned that the differential modification of Rho3 and Ras1 could be a consequence of palmitoyltransferase levels.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Erf2 substrates are differentially modified in vegetative and meiotic cells.

(A) Filter criteria for candidate substrates that are palmitoylated by Erf2 during meiosis. (B) Each of the 238 candidates obtained is represented as a data point reflecting its molecular weight and enrichment (net spectral counts) in alk-16 over DMSO labeled erf2+ meiotic cells. Isp3 and Rho3 are the top two candidates with molecular weights ~23 kDa (shaded). (C) Fluorescence profiles of meiotic cells with indicated gene deletions or expressing endogenous or tagged Isp3 (top panels). Western blot is probed for HA (bottom panels). Ctrl, DMSO control. (D) Isp3-HA3 expression as determined by anti-HA blot of lysates from cells in distinct cellular states. Veg, vegetative cells. Mei, meiotic cells. (E) Rho3-HA3 palmitoylation in meiotic erf2+ and erf2Δ cells (top panel). Western blot is probed for HA (bottom panel). (F) Ras1 and Rho3 palmitoylation states in vegetative and meiotic cells (top panels). Western blots were probed for Ras1 and HA (bottom panels). Synchronous meiosis in indicated diploid pat1-114/pat1-114 cells was induced by shifting nitrogen-starved cultures to restrictive temperature (see Materials and Methods). Meiotic cells refer to cells 8 h after the temperature shift.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.g003

Quantitative Control of Protein Palmitoylation by Varying Palmitoyltransferase Levels

To test this hypothesis, we first reduced erf2 expression in diploid cells undergoing synchronized meiosis, achieving intermediate and low expression levels relative to wild type (Figure 4A). Although all three substrates require Erf2 for palmitoylation, Ras1, Rho3, and Isp3 were differentially modified as a consequence of altering erf2 levels (Figure 4A). Ras1 was efficiently palmitoylated at low erf2 expression levels, and its palmitoylation was unaltered at higher levels. In contrast, reducing erf2 expression decreased Rho3 and Isp3 palmitoylation with different sensitivities. The fact that palmitoylation of Rho3 and Isp3 are greatly attenuated at low erf2 levels suggests that the strong upregulation of erf2 expression during meiosis is needed to establish the distinctive features of the meiotic palmitoylome. In addition, these results demonstrate that modulation of palmitoyltransferase levels can differentially alter palmitoylation of individual substrates.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Quantitative control of protein palmitoylation by varying palmitoyltransferase levels affects meiotic entry.

(A) Labels are indicated in box. qPCR analysis of erf2 and erf4 transcripts normalized to act1 mRNA levels in indicated pat1-114/pat1-114 strains 8 h into synchronous meiosis (top panel). Data represent mean values of experimental triplicates ± SD Palmitoylation of cognate Erf2 substrates were analyzed from the same lysate of each strain (bottom panels). Ras1 and Rho3-HA3 were immunopurified and their levels were determined by Ras1 and HA immunoblots, respectively. Isp3 palmitoylation was monitored at the lysate level since it accounts for most of the fluorescence at ~23 kDa. (B) Labels are indicated in box. Overexpression of erf2 and/or erf4 from thiamine-repressible nmt promoters in the indicated vegetatively growing pat1-114 cells was achieved by switching them into thiamine-free medium for 24 h. qPCR analysis (top panel) as well as palmitoylation of Ras1 and Rho3 (bottom panels) were performed as described in (A). Isp3 is not expressed in vegetative cells. Cells were maintained at permissive temperature throughout this experiment. (C, D) DAPI (left) and DIC (right) images of indicated cells 96 h after erf2 and/or erf4 overexpression. The DHHC→DHHA catalytic erf2 mutant was co-overexpressed with erf4 from nmt1 promoters. Scale bars, 10 µm.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.g004

If physiological control of Erf2–Erf4 abundance accounts for the palmitoylome changes observed upon meiotic induction, we predicted that increasing Erf2–Erf4 levels in haploid vegetative cells would yield a palmitoylation profile similar to meiotic cells. To test this, we focused on Ras1 and Rho3 as model substrates since isp3 expression is restricted to meiotic cells (Figure 3D). Ras1 palmitoylation was insensitive to increases in Erf2–Erf4 levels (Figure 4B), consistent with our previous results in meiotic cells (Figure 4A). In contrast, while overexpression of erf2 and erf4 individually had no impact on Rho3 modification, we observed a striking increase in Rho3 palmitoylation when the effective Erf2–Erf4 palmitoyltransferase concentration was increased by co-overexpression of both subunits of the palmitoyltransferase complex (Figure 4B). Intermediate erf2–erf4 expression resulted in a modest increase in Rho3 palmitoylation, indicating a dose-dependent function of palmitoyltransferase activity (Figure 4B). Importantly, although erf2 and erf4 were expressed from heterologous promoters, their levels were in fact within physiological range, with the highest and lowest levels being comparable to those attained by meiotic and vegetative cells, respectively (Figure 1D). These results demonstrate the control of palmitoyltransferase levels as a mechanism by which cells can finely shape palmitoylomes, with an impact on cellular processes such as meiosis.

High Erf2 Activity Induces Meiosis in Cells Through Ectopic Rho3 Palmitoylation

If palmitoyltransferase-level-mediated changes in the global protein palmitoylation are important for meiotic entry, then increasing Erf2–Erf4 levels in vegetative cells may be sufficient to promote this process. While no obvious phenotype was observed for pat1+ cells (Figure S7), overexpression of erf2 and erf4 in proliferating haploid cells induced a striking meiotic phenotype under normal vegetative growth conditions (Figure 4C). In these cells, we observed a significant reduction in growth rate and proportion of dividing cells with time, accompanied by a reduction in cell length at division and a transient G1 delay (Figures 5A–C and S5A–C). In addition to being disrupted for vegetative growth, these erf2 and erf4 co-overexpressing cells subsequently underwent aberrant meiosis-like reductive cleavages, with a significant proportion of cells having >2 nuclei and containing spore-like structures (Figures 5D,E and S5D,E). These cells were indeed undergoing a meiotic program as deletion of mei4, which is required for meiotic but not mitotic divisions [46], suppressed the appearance of these multinucleated cells, resulting in misshapen cells arrested with a single nucleus (Figure 5E). This meiotic phenotype was dependent on high palmitoyltransferase levels, since cells maintained vegetative growth when erf2 and erf4 are expressed at low or intermediate levels (Figures 4C and 5E). Critically, this meiotic phenotype was not observed in cells co-overexpressing a catalytically inactive Erf2 mutant and Erf4 (Figure 4D) or in cells overproducing either Erf2 or Erf4 alone (Figure 4C), highlighting the requirement for a functional and active palmitoyltransferase complex. Together with the delay in meiotic entry observed in erf2Δ cells (Figure S6A,B), these results demonstrate that coordinated regulation of Erf2–Erf4 activity through changes in the expression of each subunit contributes to meiotic entry in fission yeast.

thumbnail

Figure 5. Overproduction of Erf2 and Erf4 in proliferating cells disrupts vegetative growth and induces aberrant meiosis and sporulation inpat1-114 cells.

erf2 OE erf4 OE refers to strain 7 from Figure 4B that co-overexpresses erf2 and erf4 at high levels. These cells were grown in the presence of nutrients at permissive temperature, and co-overexpression of erf2 and erf4 was induced by switching cells to thiamine-free medium (see Materials and Methods). Indicated times or time intervals refer to time after induction of erf2 and erf4 co-overexpression. (A) Fold change in OD595 of cultures during indicated 12 h intervals. OD595 was maintained <0.6. (B) DNA content analysis. (C) Blankophor staining of cells (top panels). Dimensions of septated cells (cell length and width, n = 20) and percentage of septated cells (septation index, n≥200) were determined by measuring and counting blankophor-stained cells (bottom panels, left to right). Error bars, SD. (D) Percentage of cells with 1, 2, or >2 nuclei (n≥200) was determined by DAPI staining. (E) DAPI (top) and DIC (bottom) images of cells under conditions where erf2 and erf4 overexpression were repressed (+Thiamine) as well as 96 h postinduction of erf2 and erf4 co-overexpression. Scale bars, 10 µm. (F) Left panel, percentage of cells with spores (n≥200) at indicated times postinduction. Right panel, DIC images of cells 96 h postinduction before (top) and after (bottom) β-glucuronidase digestion, which specifically kills vegetative cells but not spores. Nonoverexpressing pat1-114 cells continue vegetative growth under the same conditions (see Figure S5).

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.g005

As the meiotic phenotype can be induced by Erf2–Erf4 overproduction, we reasoned that the Erf2–Erf4 substrates involved in triggering meiosis would have to be present in vegetative cells and sensitive to Erf2–Erf4 levels for their palmitoylation state. One such substrate is Rho3, whose palmitoylation state depends on erf2 expression (Figure 4A,B). We found that Rho3, but not Ras1, is required for the meiotic phenotype triggered by Erf2–Erf4 overexpression in haploid cells (Figure 6A). This is clearly dependent on Rho3 palmitoylation, as cells expressing palmitoylation-deficient Rho3 failed to undergo Erf2-induced meiosis (Figure 6A,B). Genetic interaction between erf2, erf4, and pat1, which encodes the general inhibitor of meiosis, further supports the meiotic role of Erf2–Erf4 (Figure S7). Expression of erf2 and erf4 is upregulated in cells undergoing normal meiosis when encountering low nitrogen conditions [36], which normally initiates mating and subsequent meiosis, supporting our conclusion that high erf2/erf4 levels promote meiotic entry. Overall, our results suggest that palmitoyltransferase-level-mediated modulation of the palmitoylome is a determinant of meiotic entry, likely via Rho3 function that is regulated by its palmitoylation state, closely interacting with the Pat1 kinase.

thumbnail

Figure 6. Palmitoylation-dependent Rho3 function is required for the Erf2-induced meiotic phenotype.

(A) DAPI (top) and DIC (bottom) images of erf2 and erf4 co-overexpressing cells with indicated genotypes at 96 h postinduction. Vectors expressing internally tagged wild-type and mutant (Cys4→Ala) Rho3-HA3 proteins from the nmt41 promoter were integrated into the chromosome of rho3Δ cells. Scale bars, 10 µm. (B) Alk-16-associated fluorescence of Rho3 and palmitoylation-deficient Rho3(C4A) (top panel). Western blots were probed for HA (bottom panel).

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.g006

Discussion

By analyzing multiple cognate substrates of a single palmitoyltransferase in a physiological context, our work offers a new perspective of how global protein palmitoylation can be regulated. We showed that modulation of Erf2–Erf4 activity levels underlies the differential modification of its cognate substrates in distinct cellular states, demonstrating the quantitative control of single or multiple palmitoyltransferase activities as a fundamental mechanism by which cells shape their palmitoylomes, with potentially important consequences on cellular function.

Our results uncover an intriguing possibility that a single palmitoyltransferase can regulate different cellular processes through distinct substrates depending on its levels. Indeed, high Erf2–Erf4 palmitoyltransferase levels promote or reinforce the meiotic state in fission yeast cells, consistent with the delay in meiotic entry observed for erf2Δ cells. The fact that erf2 and erf4 overexpression induces the meiotic phenotype in pat1-114 cells where there is lower Pat1 kinase activity [47] but not in pat1+ cells suggests that a sensitized background is needed to reveal the meiotic role of Erf2–Erf4 (Figure S7). This is not unexpected since in fission yeast, exit from vegetative growth and activation of the meiotic differentiation program are tightly regulated by a multilayered network of factors with many feedback loops, each contributing to stepwise inactivation of Pat1 and sequential derepression of meiosis [48]. It is unlikely that the induced meiotic phenotype is a result of nonspecific or general cellular stress since a variety of nutritional or environmental stresses alone failed to trigger meiosis in pat1-114 cells (Figure S8). Moreover, despite the large number of genes that are shown to be regulated during meiosis or implicated in meiotic function [37],[49], only a few gene products have been shown to induce ectopic meiosis in vegetatively growing haploid wild type and/or pat1-114 cells, and many have been demonstrated to be major meiotic determinants (Figure S9). Given that increasing a single palmitoyltransferase activity is sufficient to stimulate meiosis in pat1-114 cells and that erf2 and erf4 expression is upregulated in wild-type cells undergoing normal meiosis in low nitrogen conditions [36], it is likely that Erf2–Erf4 modulates meiotic entry by contributing to Pat1 inactivation and derepression of meiosis. On the other hand, we cannot exclude the possibility that high Erf2–Erf4 levels reinforce the meiotic state once cells enter the meiotic program via positive feedback loops. It has been shown in budding yeast that commitment in meiosis does not occur until induction of middle genes [50].

Quantitative control of Rho3 palmitoylation by the Erf2–Erf4 palmitoyltransferase activity reveals a role for this family of small GTPases in meiosis. Rho3 in S. pombe regulates polarized cell growth and exocytosis [44],[45] and is involved in Golgi/endosome trafficking [51]. Delivery of cytoplasmic vesicles to discrete plasma-membrane domains is critical for establishing and maintaining cell polarity, neurite differentiation, and regulated exocytosis. Interestingly, Anastasia and co-workers showed in budding yeast that blocking membrane traffic causes a mitotic checkpoint, suggesting a link between mitotic entry and membrane growth [52]. If palmitoylation-dependent Rho3 function affects membrane trafficking, signals that are coupled to membrane growth may explain how Rho3 regulates meiotic entry in fission yeast. These signals may increase the concentration of receptors and effectors at the plasma membrane due to changes in membrane trafficking or cytoskeletal organization.

Our work has established the fission yeast S. pombe, with its relatively simple palmitoyltransferase network, as a robust and complementary model for understanding the basic control mechanisms and the function of protein palmitoylation. Palmitoylome analysis of various palmitoyltransferase-deficient mutants in budding yeast has provided clear evidence for enzyme-substrate specificity, with individual palmitoyltransferases showing a preference for substrates with common features; for example, ERF2–ERF4 substrates tend to be heterolipidated (e.g., prenylated or myristoylated) [20]. With Isp3 having an N-myristoylation motif (Figure 4D) and Ras1/Rho3 being prenylated, it appears that the orthologous Erf2–Erf4 palmitoyltransferase in fission yeast has the same substrate preference. Notably, the Erf2–Erf4:Ras1 palmitoyltransferase:substrate pairing in fission yeast is reminiscent of the ERF2–ERF4:RAS1/RAS2 and DHHC9-GCP16:H-/N-Ras pairs in budding yeast and human, respectively [16],[17],[53]. This suggests an evolutionary selection for specific cognate palmitoyltransferase:substrate pairs, which would be unlikely if palmitoyltransferases have extensive overlapping substrate preferences and were able to freely substitute for one another. The fact that ERF2–ERF4 also palmitoylates RHO3 in budding yeast [20] raises the possibility that in mammals, DHHC9-GCP16 may modify the large number of Rho GTPases with cysteines close to the N- or C-terminus that serve as potential palmitoylation sites [54]. If DHHC9-GCP16 indeed does palmitoylate Rho proteins, it would be interesting to determine if, like Erf2–Erf4, the palmitoyltransferase complex in mammals can discriminate between and differentially modify Ras and Rho proteins, potentially coordinating small GTPase function.

It remains to be determined how levels of a palmitoyltransferase affect its substrate specificity. One possibility is a difference in catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM), and this is supported by the discovery of specificity determinants on both the palmitoyltransferases and their substrates that dictate enzyme-substrate interactions [22],[55]. In addition, level-dependent changes in palmitoyltransferase localization might alter substrate availability. For example, DHHC2 translocates to postsynaptic membranes upon neuronal stimulation, where it increases palmitoylation and synaptic targeting of PSD-95 [6]. In our study, however, changes in palmitoyltransferase localization are unlikely to account for the difference in Ras1 and Rho3 palmitoylation since both substrates are localized to the same compartments in vegetative cells [38],[44]. Alternatively, it may be a result of titration by competing cellular factors that target substrates differentially [4],[14],[56][58].

As global proteomic studies rapidly expand the known list of proteins that are reversibly modified with this lipid moiety [13],[20],[35],[59],[60], palmitoylation is poised to be a major cellular regulator. This is supported by expression profiling experiments in flies and humans in which transcript levels of specific palmitoyltransferases vary widely across tissues [23],[24]. Neuronal differentiation signals were found to induce palmitoyltransferase degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [61]. In addition, palmitoyltransferase overexpression is associated with a variety of human cancers and induces cellular transformation [29],[30],[62],[63]. To our knowledge, our study provides the first evidence that differential protein palmitoylation as a result of regulated palmitoyltransferase levels can influence cellular behavior. Although the palmitoylation machinery is more elaborate in multicellular eukaryotes, the fact that Ras and Rho GTPases are essential for cellular differentiation and development in mammals [54] as well as the conservation of palmitoyltransferase function and specific palmitoyltransferase:substrate pairs between yeast and humans [17],[20],[53] indicate that our conclusions provide fundamental insights for regulatory roles of palmitoylation in major developmental transitions in metazoa.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Growth Conditions

Standard media and methods were used [64],[65]. Strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. All experiments were carried out in minimal medium (EMM) and minimal medium plus supplements (EMM4S) for prototrophic and auxotrophic strains, respectively, at 25°C unless otherwise noted. When applicable, strains were generated by tetrad dissection and validated by marker segregation or PCR. Deletion strains, strains expressing erf2-HA3, isp3-HA3, and those expressing erf2 and erf4 from nmt promoters were constructed by PCR integration [66]. For Rho3, the HA3-tag sequence was inserted in-frame 42 bp upstream of its termination codon by PCR integration. Functional rescue in erf2Δ cells was performed using the pDUAL plasmid (RIKEN BRC, Japan) expressing YFP-FLAG-His6-erf2 under the nmt41 promoter, which was linearized and integrated into the leu1 locus. The Quikchange XL II kit (Stratagene) was used for site-directed mutagenesis of the erf2 DHHC motif. Homozygous diploids were obtained by incubating midlog cultures of haploid cells with 20 µg/ml Carbendazim (Sigma) for 4.5 h at 25°C and screening colonies on YES+phloxin B plates.

Synchronized Pat1-Driven Meiosis

Pat1-driven meiosis in homozygous diploid h-/h- pat1-114/pat1-114 cells was carried out as described [37]. Midlog cultures grown in EMM, which contains 0.5% NH4Cl, were filter-washed three times with nitrogen-free minimal medium (EMM-N) using the Microfil filtration system (Millipore), and resuspended in EMM-N for 14 h at 25°C. Meiosis was induced by shifting the cultures to the restrictive temperature of 34°C in the presence of 0.05% NH4Cl. t = 0 is defined as the time of the temperature shift.

erf2 and/or erf4 Overexpression From Thiamine-Repressible nmt Promoters

Cultures were grown to midlog in EMM plus 10 mg/ml thiamine at 25°C. All cells proliferate normally under these conditions. erf2 and/or erf4 expression from nmt promoters was induced by filter-washing the cells three times with EMM as described above. The cells were resuspended in EMM and growth was maintained at 25°C. The cultures were diluted with EMM approximately every 12 h for the duration of each experiment to keep OD595<0.6 and in the presence of nutrients. t = 0 h is defined as the time of thiamine removal.

Flow Cytometry

DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry using ethanol-fixed and propidium iodide-stained cells (2 µg/mL propidium iodide in 50 mM sodium citrate) on a BD FACS Calibur and analyzed using FlowJo software.

Cell Size Measurements and DNA Staining

For cell size measurements, live cells were stained with Blankophore (MP Biomedicals). For DNA staining, ethanol-fixed cells were stained with DAPI. Images were acquired in Metamorph (MDS Analytical Technologies) using an Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss) and a CoolSNAP HQ camera (Roper Scientific). Cell size measurements were obtained using the Pointpicker plug-in of Image J (National Institute of Health).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using acidic phenol, DNase I-treated, and purified with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). RNA concentration was quantified and its integrity was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA was synthesized using random hexamers and the SuperScriptIII First Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Invitrogen). Relative quantification of cDNA was carried out in triplicate for each independent experiment using qPCR MasterMix Plus for SYBR Green (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI 7900 Real-Time PCR system. Primers used for quantitative PCR are listed in Table S3. Standard curves were generated using at least six 2-fold serial dilutions of a control sample and values within the linear exponential phase were used to calculate relative concentrations after normalization to the endogenous actin controls.

Metabolic Labeling and Preparation of Cell Lysates

Cells were labeled with 10 µM of alk-16 (20–50 mM DMSO stock) for 15 min, washed once with PBS prior to liquid nitrogen freezing and storage at −80°C. For inhibitor experiments, cells were preincubated for 30 min with either 200 µg/mL CHX or 200 µM 2BP, which were maintained in the cultures during alk-16 labeling. Competition experiments were carried out with various palmitate concentrations in the cultures during metabolic labeling. To prepare cell lysates, Brij lysis buffer (1% (v/v) Brij-97, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM triethanolamine pH 7.4, 5× concentration of Roche EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail, 10 mM PMSF) and acid-washed glass beads (Sigma) were added to the frozen yeast cell pellets, which were lysed (3×20 s) using the Fastprep homogenizer (Thermo Scientific) at 4 min intervals to avoid overheating. Lysates were spun at 1,000 g for 5 min to remove cellular debris. Typical lysate protein concentrations of 5–10 mg/mL were obtained, as quantified using the BCA assay (Pierce).

Immunoprecipitations and Bioorthogonal Labeling

For analyses of whole cell lysates, 50 µg of protein was diluted with Brij lysis buffer to a final volume of 44.5 µL, to which 5.5 µL of freshly mixed CuI-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reagents were added. The CuAAC reagents consisted of 1 µL az-Rho (5 mM stock solution in DMSO), 1 µL tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) (50 mM freshly prepared stock solution in deionized water), 2.5 µL tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]amine (TBTA) (2 mM stock solution in 1:4 DMSO:t-butanol), and 1 µL CuSO4·5H2O (50 mM freshly prepared stock solution in deionized water). After 1 h at room temperature, proteins were methanol-chloroform precipitated to remove excess CuAAC reagents. The protein pellets were air-dried and resuspended in SDS buffer (4% (w/v) SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM triethanolamine pH 7.4) by sonication before SDS-PAGE. For Ras1 and HA immunoprecipitations, 1–3 mg of cell lysate was added to 4 µg anti-Ras antibody (Ras10, Millipore) with 25 µL Protein A agarose (Roche) or to 15 µL of anti-HA antibody–conjugated agarose (3F10, Roche), respectively. After 2 h incubation with rocking at 4°C, the beads were washed three times with ice-cold RIPA buffer (1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 50 mM triethanolamine pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl). The washed beads were resuspended in 20 µL of PBS and 2.25 µL freshly mixed CuAAC reagents described above. The beads were then washed three times with ice-cold RIPA buffer prior to boiling in SDS buffer for SDS-PAGE.

In-Gel Fluorescence Scanning and Western Blots

Fluorescence gels were visualized on a Typhoon 9400 variable mode imager (GE Healthcare) at excitation 532 nm/emission 580 nm. For Western blotting, proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and probed with the following antibodies: anti-Ras (Ras10, Millipore), anti-tubulin (Tat1, gift from Keith Gull), and anti-HA (3F10, Roche). To avoid visualizing the light chain band in anti-Ras1 immunoblots of Ras1 immunopurifications, an Fc-specific anti-mouse-HRP secondary antibody (A2544, Sigma) was used. Blots were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (GE Healthcare). Images were processed using Image J.

Affinity Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry

CuAAC reagents (az-azo-biotin) [41] were added to 10 mg cell lysate at the same concentrations described above. Proteins were methanol-precipitated and resulting air-dried protein pellets were resuspended in 1 mL SDS buffer containing 10 mM EDTA by sonication. The mixture was diluted 1:3 with Brij lysis buffer and incubated with 100 µL of washed streptavidin agarose resin (Pierce) for 1 h on a nutating mixer at room temperature. The beads were then washed once with 0.2% (w/v) SDS in PBS, three times with PBS, and twice with 250 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC). Beads were resuspended in 500 µL 8 M urea, and reactive cysteines were alkylated by addition of 25 µL 200 mM TCEP and 25 µL 400 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min. The beads were washed twice with 50 mM ABC. Two sequential elutions of proteins from the resin were performed by incubating the beads with 250 µL of 25 mM sodium dithionite in 50 mM ABC with 0.1% (w/v) SDS for 30 min each. Proteins were concentrated using YM-10 Centricons (Millipore), dried in a speed vac, and separated by SDS-PAGE. Upon staining with Coomassie blue, each lane was cut into 10 slices for trypsin digestion and peptide extraction. Extracted peptides were dried and resuspended in 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid for mass spectrometry identification. Acquired MS/MS spectra were analyzed using the Sequest search engine to identify proteins from the primary sequence database obtained from the S. pombe GeneDB. Exported Sequest results were analyzed using Scaffold (Proteome Software).

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

S. pombe meiosis is a specialized and tightly regulated process. (A) Fission yeast cells normally proliferate as haploids through the mitotic cell cycle (right cycle, shaded), replicating their genome (S phase) and dividing the genetic material equally between two daughter cells during mitosis (M phase). When nutrients such as nitrogen become limiting, cells may enter an alternate meiotic differentiation pathway that is distinct from the mitotic cycle (left cycle). Haploid cells transiently arrest in G1 and conjugate with cells of opposite mating types to form a diploid zygote. These diploids replicate their genome (meiotic S phase) and then undergo two successive nuclear divisions (Meiosis I and II) to yield four haploid nuclei that mature into spores, completing meiosis. Each of these haploid spores germinates into normally dividing cells when favorable conditions return. (B) In S. pombe, the Mei2 master regulator governs the switch from the mitotic to meiotic cycle. Mei2 integrates extracellular cues (stress, nutrients, and pheromones) primarily through Ste11, and drives meiosis. Mei2 function is tightly regulated by the Pat1 kinase, which inactivates both Mei2 and Ste11, thereby preventing meiotic entry during the mitotic cell cycle [67]. Together, Pat1 and Mei2 constitute the core mitosis-meiosis switch in fission yeast. Working in concert, these key cellular factors integrate environmental cues and control entry into meiosis. The temperature-sensitive pat1-114 allele of Pat1 allows the induction of synchronous meiosis regardless of normal biological cues [32],[33]. Haploid and diploid cells harboring this mutation can be induced to undergo meiosis in a timely and predictable manner that facilitates characterization of the process by shifting the cultures from permissive to restrictive temperatures. At permissive temperature, Pat1 is active in homozygous diploids. As such, Mei2 is inactivated and cells do not enter meiosis. Although pat1-114 cells are more sensitive to pheromones [47], they proliferate normally and require the normal biological cues to enter meiosis at permissive temperature. On the other hand, at restrictive temperature, Pat1 is inactivated and derepression of Mei2 function induces spontaneous meiosis in pat1-114 cells.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Specific and sensitive bioorthogonal detection of protein palmitoylation and palmitoyltransferase activity in vivo in fission yeast. (A) Schematic representation of the bioorthogonal detection protocol. Alk-16, alkyne-functionalized palmitate reporter; Az-rho, azide-functionalized rhodamine fluorophore; CuAAC, copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition. (B) In-gel fluorescent detection of alk-16-labeled proteins in lysates and immunopurified Ras1 (Ras1 IP). Protein load was determined by Coomassie blue staining of the gel. (C, D) Fluorescent detection of immunopurified Ras1, a known palmitoylated protein, from alk-16-labeled cells (top panels). Western blots were probed for Ras1 (bottom panels). Palmitate competed with alk-16 labeling in a dose-dependent manner (C). Ras1-associated fluorescence was greatly diminished by pre-incubating cells with a general palmitoylation inhibitor 2-bromopalmitate (2BP) or by selective post-CuAAC cleavage of palmitoylation-specific thioester linkages with hydroxylamine (NH2OH). Pretreatment of cells with protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) had little effect on posttranslational Ras1 labeling by alk-16 (D).

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Erf2 and Erf4 expression is selectively regulated during sexual differentiation in fission yeast. (A) Partial amino acid sequence alignments and consensus sequence of S. pombe palmitoyltransferases and phenotypes of null mutants [68]. (B) qPCR analysis of palmitoyltransferase transcripts in vegetative and meiotic pat1-114/pat1-114 cells. y-axis, fold change, meiotic/vegetative levels. All transcript levels were normalized to act1 mRNA. Error bars, SD.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

Enrichment and identification of Erf2 substrates that are selectively palmitoylated during meiosis. (A) Schematic representation of the selective enrichment protocol of alk-16-modified proteins from cell lysates. Az-azo-biotin, Azide-functionalized biotin probe with an azobenzene cleavable linker; CuAAC, copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition. (B) Selective enrichment of Ras1 in Na2S2O4 elutions from lysates of cells metabolically labeled with alk-16 (bottom panel) over input lysates (top panel). Western blots were probed for Ras1. (C) Coomassie blue stain of proteins before (input, top panel) and after affinity enrichment/elution (bottom panel). Slices of the bottom gel were processed for gel-based mass spectrometry. (D) Amino acid sequences of Rho3 and Isp3, both of which were validated to be Erf2 substrates that are selectively palmitoylated in meiotic cells in Figure 3. Yellow, identified peptides; Green, modified amino acids in identified peptides (e.g., oxidation, carbamidomethylation).

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s004

(TIF)

Figure S5.

Ectopic meiosis in haploid pat1-114 cells co-overexpressing erf2 and erf4. erf2 OE erf4 OE: strain 7 from Figure 4C that co-overexpresses erf2 and erf4 at high levels. These cells were grown at permissive temperature, and co-overexpression of erf2 and erf4 was induced by switching cells to thiamine-free medium (see Materials and Methods). Nonoverexpressing pat1-114 cells (erf2 erf4) continue vegetative growth under these conditions. Indicated times or time intervals refer to time after the switch to thiamine-free medium. (A) Fold change in OD595 of cultures during indicated 12 h intervals. OD595 was maintained <0.6. (B) DNA content analysis. (C) Blankophor staining of cells (left panels). Scale bars, 10 µm. Dimensions of septated cells (cell length and width, n = 20, middle panels) and percentage of septated cells (septation index, n≥200, right panel) were determined by measuring and counting blankophor-stained cells. Error bars, SD. (D) Percentage of cells with 1, 2, or >2 nuclei (n≥200) was determined by DAPI staining of the indicated strains. (E) Percentage of cells with spores at indicated times postinduction (n≥200).

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s005

(TIF)

Figure S6.

erf2Δ cells are delayed in meiotic entry. (A) Schematic representation of fission yeast sexual differentiation. Haploid cells conjugate to form a diploid zygote, which undergoes meiosis to yield four haploid nuclei that matures into spores. Pat1 kinase is a repressor of meiosis. For more details on S. pombe meiosis, see Figure S1. (B) DNA content analysis of indicated strains after meiotic induction by thermal inactivation of Pat1. (C) Percentage of cells with 1, 2, or >2 nuclei were determined by counting ≥200 DAPI-stained cells of the indicated strains at hourly intervals after meiotic induction (left panel). Representative DIC (middle panel) and DAPI (right panel) images of cells at indicated times. Scale bars, 10 µm. Synchronous meiosis in the indicated diploid pat1-114/pat1-114 cells was induced by shifting nitrogen-starved cultures to a restrictive temperature (see Materials and Methods). Indicated times refer to the elapsed time after temperature shift.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s006

(TIF)

Figure S7.

Erf2-Erf4 function in meiotic control is revealed in pat1-114 cells. DAPI and DIC staining of haploid cells at 96 h after induction of erf2 and erf4 co-overexpression. Cells were grown in the presence of nutrients at permissive temperature. Scale bars, 10 µm. Erf2–Erf4-induced meiosis is observed in pat1-114 (top panels) but not pat1+ cells (bottom panels). Our data suggest that Erf2–Erf4 function in meiotic control is unmasked in pat1-114 cells where there is lower Pat1 kinase activity [47]. It is likely that high Erf2–Erf4 activity induces ectopic meiosis by either activating the Ste11-Mei2 pathway or inactivating Pat1.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s007

(TIF)

Figure S8.

pat1-114 cells do not enter meiosis when exposed to nutritional and other stresses. DAPI and DIC images of pat1-114 cells upon exposure to indicated stresses. Scale bars, 10 µm. (A) Nutritional stress. Cells were grown at high densities for 7 d at 25°C in minimal medium containing the indicated sole nitrogen source (NH4Cl, glutamate, proline) or in nitrogen-free minimal medium (N-free). Proline is considered to be a poor nitrogen source. (B) Osmotic stress. Cells were grown in minimal medium containing 1 M sorbitol, 0.4 M NaCl, or 1 M KCl for 5 d at 25°C. No meiotic cells were observed in these experiments.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s008

(TIF)

Figure S9.

Gene products that induce ectopic meiosis in haploid S. pombe cells. (A) Of the thousands of genes that significantly regulated during meiosis [37],[49], the listed gene products are demonstrated to induce meiosis in haploid cells, highlighting their regulatory roles in the important cellular transition. The exact molecular mechanisms by which some of these gene products modulate meiotic entry remain to be elucidated. Unless otherwise stated, cells are pat1+. (B) Signaling network that regulates fission yeast meiotic entry. In S. pombe, the Mei2 master regulator governs the switch from the mitotic to meiotic cycle. Mei2 integrates extracellular cues (stress, nutrients, and pheromones) primarily through Ste11, and drives meiosis. Mei2 function is tightly regulated by the Pat1 kinase, which inactivates both Mei2 and Ste11, thereby preventing meiotic entry during the mitotic cell cycle [67]. Together, Pat1 and Mei2 constitute the core mitosis-meiosis switch in fission yeast. Under physiological conditions, complete inactivation of Pat1 and meiotic induction strictly requires the stoichiometric inhibitor Mei3, which is only expressed in heterozygous diploids formed after successful conjugation [69][71]. Working in concert, these key cellular factors integrate environmental cues and control cellular entry into meiosis. For simplification, many factors and interactions are omitted in this representation. Meiotic activators and repressors are in green and red, respectively. Dashed lines represent proposed mechanism of Erf2–Erf4 in this study. Erf2 and Erf4 expression is significantly upregulated in meiotic cells compared to vegetative cells, and elevated Erf2–Erf4 levels promote the meiotic state by activating Mei2 and/or inactivating Pat1. Dotted lines represent either direct or indirect interactions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s009

(TIF)

Table S1.

S. pombe strains used in this study.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s010

(DOC)

Table S2.

Candidate Erf2 substrates that are selectively palmitoylated during meiosis. Proteins were sorted in by their net spectral counts over the DMSO samples in meiotic homozygous diploid erf2+/erf2+ pat1-114/pat1-114 cells. Based on molecular weight and enrichment over the DMSO control, Isp3 and Rho3 were chosen and biochemically validated in this study.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s011

(DOC)

Table S3.

Oligonucleotide primers used in quantitative RT-PCR.

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001597.s012

(DOC)

Author Contributions

The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: MMZ. Performed the experiments: MMZ PYW. Analyzed the data: MMZ PYW PN HCH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MMZ FDK. Wrote the paper: MMZ PYW HCH.

References

  1. 1. Fukata Y, Fukata M (2010) Protein palmitoylation in neuronal development and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 161–175. doi: 10.1038/nrn2788
  2. 2. Resh MD (2006) Trafficking and signaling by fatty-acylated and prenylated proteins. Nat Chem Biol 2: 584–590. doi: 10.1038/nchembio834
  3. 3. Linder ME, Deschenes RJ (2007) Palmitoylation: policing protein stability and traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 74–84. doi: 10.1038/nrm2084
  4. 4. Martin BR, Wang C, Adibekian A, Tully SE, Cravatt BF (2011) Global profiling of dynamic protein palmitoylation. Nat Methods 9: 84–89. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1769
  5. 5. Salaun C, Greaves J, Chamberlain LH (2010) The intracellular dynamic of protein palmitoylation. J Cell Biol 191: 1229–1238. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201008160
  6. 6. Noritake J, Fukata Y, Iwanaga T, Hosomi N, Tsutsumi R, et al. (2009) Mobile DHHC palmitoylating enzyme mediates activity-sensitive synaptic targeting of PSD-95. J Cell Biol 186: 147–160. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200903101
  7. 7. El-Husseini Ael D, Schnell E, Dakoji S, Sweeney N, Zhou Q, et al. (2002) Synaptic strength regulated by palmitate cycling on PSD-95. Cell 108: 849–863. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00683-9
  8. 8. Zhang MM, Tsou LK, Charron G, Raghavan AS, Hang HC (2010) Tandem fluorescence imaging of dynamic S-acylation and protein turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 8627–8632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912306107
  9. 9. Wedegaertner PB, Bourne HR (1994) Activation and depalmitoylation of Gs alpha. Cell 77: 1063–1070. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90445-6
  10. 10. Degtyarev MY, Spiegel AM, Jones TL (1993) Increased palmitoylation of the Gs protein alpha subunit after activation by the beta-adrenergic receptor or cholera toxin. J Biol Chem 268: 23769–23772.
  11. 11. Mouillac B, Caron M, Bonin H, Dennis M, Bouvier M (1992) Agonist-modulated palmitoylation of beta 2-adrenergic receptor in Sf9 cells. J Biol Chem 267: 21733–21737.
  12. 12. Mundy DI, Warren G (1992) Mitosis and inhibition of intracellular transport stimulate palmitoylation of a 62-kD protein. J Cell Biol 116: 135–146. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.1.135
  13. 13. Kang R, Wan J, Arstikaitis P, Takahashi H, Huang K, et al. (2008) Neural palmitoyl-proteomics reveals dynamic synaptic palmitoylation. Nature 456: 904–909. doi: 10.1038/nature07605
  14. 14. Ahearn IM, Tsai FD, Court H, Zhou M, Jennings BC, et al. (2011) FKBP12 binds to acylated h-ras and promotes depalmitoylation. Mol Cell 41: 173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.01.001
  15. 15. Roth AF, Feng Y, Chen L, Davis NG (2002) The yeast DHHC cysteine-rich domain protein Akr1p is a palmitoyl transferase. J Cell Biol 159: 23–28. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200206120
  16. 16. Bartels DJ, Mitchell DA, Dong X, Deschenes RJ (1999) Erf2, a novel gene product that affects the localization and palmitoylation of Ras2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19: 6775–6787.
  17. 17. Lobo S, Greentree WK, Linder ME, Deschenes RJ (2002) Identification of a Ras palmitoyltransferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 277: 41268–41273. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m206573200
  18. 18. Mitchell DA, Hamel LD, Ishizuka K, Mitchell G, Schaefer LM, et al. (2012) The Erf4 subunit of the yeast Ras palmitoyl acyl transferase is required for stability of the acyl-Erf2 intermediate and palmitoyl transfer to a Ras2 substrate. J Biol Chem 287 (41) 34337–34348. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m112.379297
  19. 19. Zhao L, Lobo S, Dong X, Ault AD, Deschenes RJ (2002) Erf4p and Erf2p form an endoplasmic reticulum-associated complex involved in the plasma membrane localization of yeast Ras proteins. J Biol Chem 277: 49352–49359. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m209760200
  20. 20. Roth AF, Wan J, Bailey AO, Sun B, Kuchar JA, et al. (2006) Global analysis of protein palmitoylation in yeast. Cell 125: 1003–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.042
  21. 21. Fukata M, Fukata Y, Adesnik H, Nicoll RA, Bredt DS (2004) Identification of PSD-95 palmitoylating enzymes. Neuron 44: 987–996. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.005
  22. 22. Huang K, Sanders S, Singaraja R, Orban P, Cijsouw T, et al. (2009) Neuronal palmitoyl acyl transferases exhibit distinct substrate specificity. FASEB J 23: 2605–2615. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-127399
  23. 23. Bannan BA, Van Etten J, Kohler JA, Tsoi Y, Hansen NM, et al. (2008) The Drosophila protein palmitoylome: characterizing palmitoyl-thioesterases and DHHC palmitoyl-transferases. Fly (Austin) 2: 198–214.
  24. 24. Ohno Y, Kihara A, Sano T, Igarashi Y (2006) Intracellular localization and tissue-specific distribution of human and yeast DHHC cysteine-rich domain-containing proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1761: 474–483. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.03.010
  25. 25. Saleem AN, Chen YH, Baek HJ, Hsiao YW, Huang HW, et al. (2010) Mice with alopecia, osteoporosis, and systemic amyloidosis due to mutation in Zdhhc13, a gene coding for palmitoyl acyltransferase. PLoS Genet 6: e1000985 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000985.
  26. 26. Mill P, Lee AW, Fukata Y, Tsutsumi R, Fukata M, et al. (2009) Palmitoylation regulates epidermal homeostasis and hair follicle differentiation. PLoS Genet 5: e1000748 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000748.
  27. 27. Singaraja RR, Hadano S, Metzler M, Givan S, Wellington CL, et al. (2002) HIP14, a novel ankyrin domain-containing protein, links huntingtin to intracellular trafficking and endocytosis. Hum Mol Genet 11: 2815–2828. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.23.2815
  28. 28. Mukai J, Dhilla A, Drew LJ, Stark KL, Cao L, et al. (2008) Palmitoylation-dependent neurodevelopmental deficits in a mouse model of 22q11 microdeletion. Nat Neurosci 11: 1302–1310. doi: 10.1038/nn.2204
  29. 29. Draper JM, Smith CD (2010) DHHC20: a human palmitoyl acyltransferase that causes cellular transformation. Mol Membr Biol 27: 123–136. doi: 10.3109/09687681003616854
  30. 30. Ducker CE, Stettler EM, French KJ, Upson JJ, Smith CD (2004) Huntingtin interacting protein 14 is an oncogenic human protein: palmitoyl acyltransferase. Oncogene 23: 9230–9237. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208171
  31. 31. Iino Y, Yamamoto M (1985) Negative control for the initiation of meiosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 2447–2451. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.8.2447
  32. 32. Beach D, Rodgers L, Gould J (1985) ran1+ controls the transition from mitotic division to meiosis in fission yeast. Curr Genet 10: 297–311. doi: 10.1007/bf00365626
  33. 33. Nurse P (1985) Mutants of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe which alter the shift between cell proliferation and sporulation. Mol & Gen Genet 198: 497–502. doi: 10.1007/bf00332946
  34. 34. Charron G, Zhang MM, Yount JS, Wilson J, Raghavan AS, et al. (2009) Robust fluorescent detection of protein fatty-acylation with chemical reporters. J Am Chem Soc 131: 4967–4975. doi: 10.1021/ja810122f
  35. 35. Martin BR, Cravatt BF (2009) Large-scale profiling of protein palmitoylation in mammalian cells. Nat Methods 6: 135–138. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1293
  36. 36. Wilhelm BT, Marguerat S, Watt S, Schubert F, Wood V, et al. (2008) Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature 453: 1239–1243. doi: 10.1038/nature07002
  37. 37. Mata J, Lyne R, Burns G, Bahler J (2002) The transcriptional program of meiosis and sporulation in fission yeast. Nat Genet 32: 143–147. doi: 10.1038/ng951
  38. 38. Onken B, Wiener H, Philips MR, Chang EC (2006) Compartmentalized signaling of Ras in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 9045–9050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603318103
  39. 39. Mitchell DA, Mitchell G, Ling Y, Budde C, Deschenes RJ (2010) Mutational analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Erf2 reveals a two-step reaction mechanism for protein palmitoylation by DHHC enzymes. J Biol Chem 285: 38104–38114. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m110.169102
  40. 40. Dudler T, Gelb MH (1996) Palmitoylation of Ha-Ras facilitates membrane binding, activation of downstream effectors, and meiotic maturation in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 271: 11541–11547. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11541
  41. 41. Yang YY, Grammel M, Raghavan AS, Charron G, Hang HC (2010) Comparative analysis of cleavable azobenzene-based affinity tags for bioorthogonal chemical proteomics. Chem Biol 17: 1212–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.09.012
  42. 42. Shimoda C (1983) Existence of a mojor spore wall protein (23K) in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe: a possible sporulation-specific protein. Arch Microbiol 136: 26–27. doi: 10.1007/bf00415605
  43. 43. Sato S, Suzuki H, Widyastuti U, Hotta Y, Tabata S (1994) Identification and characterization of genes induced during sexual differentiation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Genet 26: 31–37. doi: 10.1007/bf00326301
  44. 44. Nakano K, Imai J, Arai R, Toh EA, Matsui Y, et al. (2002) The small GTPase Rho3 and the diaphanous/formin For3 function in polarized cell growth in fission yeast. J Cell Sci 115: 4629–4639. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00150
  45. 45. Wang H, Tang X, Balasubramanian MK (2003) Rho3p regulates cell separation by modulating exocyst function in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 164: 1323–1331.
  46. 46. Horie S, Watanabe Y, Tanaka K, Nishiwaki S, Fujioka H, et al. (1998) The Schizosaccharomyces pombe mei4+ gene encodes a meiosis-specific transcription factor containing a forkhead DNA-binding domain. Mol Cell Biol 18: 2118–2129.
  47. 47. Davey J, Nielsen O (1994) Mutations in cyr1 and pat1 reveal pheromone-induced G1 arrest in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Genet 26: 105–112. doi: 10.1007/bf00313796
  48. 48. Harigaya Y, Yamamoto M (2007) Molecular mechanisms underlying the mitosis-meiosis decision. Chromosome Res 15: 523–537. doi: 10.1007/s10577-007-1151-0
  49. 49. Mata J, Wilbrey A, Bahler J (2007) Transcriptional regulatory network for sexual differentiation in fission yeast. Genome Biol 8: R217. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r217
  50. 50. Winter E (2012) The Sum1/Ndt80 transcriptional switch and commitment to meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76: 1–15. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.05010-11
  51. 51. Kita A, Li C, Yu Y, Umeda N, Doi A, et al. (2011) Role of the small GTPase Rho3 in Golgi/Endosome trafficking through functional interaction with adaptin in fission yeast. PLoS One 6: e16842 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016842.
  52. 52. Anastasia SD, Nguyen DL, Thai V, Meloy M, MacDonough T, et al. (2012) A link between mitotic entry and membrane growth suggests a novel model for cell size control. J Cell Biol 197: 89–104. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201108108
  53. 53. Swarthout JT, Lobo S, Farh L, Croke MR, Greentree WK, et al. (2005) DHHC9 and GCP16 constitute a human protein fatty acyltransferase with specificity for H- and N-Ras. J Biol Chem 280: 31141–31148. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m504113200
  54. 54. Heasman SJ, Ridley AJ (2008) Mammalian Rho GTPases: new insights into their functions from in vivo studies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 690–701. doi: 10.1038/nrm2476
  55. 55. Nadolski MJ, Linder ME (2009) Molecular recognition of the palmitoylation substrate Vac8 by its palmitoyltransferase Pfa3. J Biol Chem 284: 17720–17730. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m109.005447
  56. 56. Ho GP, Selvakumar B, Mukai J, Hester LD, Wang Y, et al. (2011) S-nitrosylation and S-palmitoylation reciprocally regulate synaptic targeting of PSD-95. Neuron 71: 131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.033
  57. 57. Dekker FJ, Rocks O, Vartak N, Menninger S, Hedberg C, et al. (2010) Small-molecule inhibition of APT1 affects Ras localization and signaling. Nat Chem Biol 6: 449–456. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.362
  58. 58. Siegel G, Obernosterer G, Fiore R, Oehmen M, Bicker S, et al. (2009) A functional screen implicates microRNA-138-dependent regulation of the depalmitoylation enzyme APT1 in dendritic spine morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 11: 705–716. doi: 10.1038/ncb1876
  59. 59. Wilson JP, Raghavan AS, Yang YY, Charron G, Hang HC (2011) Proteomic analysis of fatty-acylated proteins in mammalian cells with chemical reporters reveals S-acylation of histone H3 variants. Mol Cell Proteomics 10: M110 001198. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m110.001198
  60. 60. Yount JS, Moltedo B, Yang YY, Charron G, Moran TM, et al. (2010) Palmitoylome profiling reveals S-palmitoylation-dependent antiviral activity of IFITM3. Nat Chem Biol 6: 610–614. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.405
  61. 61. Li Y, Martin BR, Cravatt BF, Hofmann SL (2011) DHHC5 palmitoylates flotillin-2 and is rapidly degraded on induction of neuronal differentiation in cultured cells. J Biol Chem 287 (1) 523–530. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m111.306183
  62. 62. Mansilla F, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Kruhoffer M, Sorensen FB, Andersen CL, et al. (2007) Differential expression of DHHC9 in microsatellite stable and instable human colorectal cancer subgroups. Br J Cancer 96: 1896–1903.
  63. 63. Yamamoto Y, Chochi Y, Matsuyama H, Eguchi S, Kawauchi S, et al. (2007) Gain of 5p15.33 is associated with progression of bladder cancer. Oncology 72: 132–138. doi: 10.1159/000111132
  64. 64. Hayles J, Nurse P (1992) Genetics of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Annu Rev Genet 26: 373–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.002105
  65. 65. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P (1991) Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol 194: 795–823. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-l
  66. 66. Bahler J, Wu JQ, Longtine MS, Shah NG, McKenzie A 3rd, et al. (1998) Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14: 943–951.
  67. 67. Watanabe Y, Shinozaki-Yabana S, Chikashige Y, Hiraoka Y, Yamamoto M (1997) Phosphorylation of RNA-binding protein controls cell cycle switch from mitotic to meiotic in fission yeast. Nature 386: 187–190. doi: 10.1038/386187a0
  68. 68. Wood V, Gwilliam R, Rajandream MA, Lyne M, Lyne R, et al. (2002) The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 415: 871–880. doi: 10.1038/nature724
  69. 69. Li P, McLeod M (1996) Molecular mimicry in development: identification of ste11+ as a substrate and mei3+ as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of ran1+ kinase. Cell 87: 869–880. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81994-7
  70. 70. McLeod M, Beach D (1988) A specific inhibitor of the ran1+ protein kinase regulates entry into meiosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 332: 509–514. doi: 10.1038/332509a0
  71. 71. Van Heeckeren WJ, Dorris DR, Struhl K (1998) The mating-type proteins of fission yeast induce meiosis by directly activating mei3 transcription. Mol Cell Biol 18: 7317–7326.