Research Article

A sex-ratio Meiotic Drive System in Drosophila simulans. I: An Autosomal Suppressor

  • Yun Tao mail,

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:

    Affiliations: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

  • John P Masly,

    Affiliation: Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America

    ¤ Current address: Department of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

  • Luciana Araripe,

    Affiliation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Yeyan Ke,

    Affiliation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Daniel L Hartl

    Affiliation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Published: November 06, 2007
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050292


Sex ratio distortion (sex-ratio for short) has been reported in numerous species such as Drosophila, where distortion can readily be detected in experimental crosses, but the molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here we characterize an autosomal sex-ratio suppressor from D. simulans that we designate as not much yang (nmy, polytene chromosome position 87F3). Nmy suppresses an X-linked sex-ratio distorter, contains a pair of near-perfect inverted repeats of 345 bp, and evidently originated through retrotransposition from the distorter itself. The suppression is likely mediated by sequence homology between the suppressor and distorter. The strength of sex-ratio is greatly enhanced by lower temperature. This temperature sensitivity was used to assign the sex-ratio etiology to the maturation process of the Y-bearing sperm, a hypothesis corroborated by both light microscope observations and ultrastructural studies. It has long been suggested that an X-linked sex-ratio distorter can evolve by exploiting loopholes in the meiotic machinery for its own transmission advantage, which may be offset by other changes in the genome that control the selfish distorter. Data obtained in this study help to understand this evolutionary mechanism in molecular detail and provide insight regarding its evolutionary impact on genomic architecture and speciation.

Author Summary

Genetic conflicts among genes happen when their modes of transmission differ. Genes in the heterogametic (XY) sex can be grouped as X-linked, Y-linked, autosomal, or cytoplasmic. Sex ratio in the progeny greatly affects the transmission advantage of each of the four types of genes, with the optimal sex ratio for each type being respectively 100%, 0%, 50%, and 100% of females. Sex ratio can often be biased from the normal 50% by genes that distort the sex ratio toward their own optimal transmission. Here we report genetic and molecular characterization of an autosomal gene that functions as a suppressor of an X-linked sex-ratio distorter. Male mutants give rise to female-biased progeny. The cause of the distortion was assigned to a failure of the Y-bearing sperm to mature. The DNA sequence of the suppressor gives clues to understanding the sex-ratio meiotic drive at the molecular level. More generally, the genetic conflict over sex ratio may be important in determining the evolutionary dynamics and the architecture of eukaryotic genomes.


As a rule, most dioecious species produce equal numbers of male and female progeny because the rarer sex has a mating advantage. R. A. Fisher in 1930, as well as Carl Düsing in 1884 before him, framed arguments based on parental expenditure that mandates an equilibrium sex ratio of 50% female [1,2]. This so-called Fisher's principle is based on the premise that genes have maximum representation in future generations only if they are equally transmitted through both sexes [3]. However, sex ratios in nature sometimes show marked departures from 50%, and there are many ecological and genetic situations where the assumptions of Fisher's principle do not hold [4,5]. One prominent example is related to sex-linked genes of the heterogametic sex. Because of their unisexual transmission, mutations that distort their meiotic transmission—thus the sex ratio—in their own favor can gain selective advantage [6]. This type of sex ratio meiotic drive, also called sex-ratio, conflicts with selection for equal transmission of autosomal genes and thus represents a typical intragenomic conflict among genes when their transmission optima are not congruent.

A sex-ratio distorter can invade a population as long as its deleterious effects on viability and fertility are offset by the biased segregation [7]. Invasion by a sex-ratio distorter creates a genetic context promoting strong selection for sex-linked or autosomal suppressors that ameliorate the segregation distortion and/or its deleterious pleiotropic effects [8]. This type of recurrent intragenomic conflict generates a dynamic of genetic “attack” and “defense,” even in the absence of any external abiotic or biotic challenges [4,9,10]. As a result, genetic conflicts over sex ratio may be a key factor in driving the evolution of gametogenesis in the heterogametic sex, thereby leading to the nearly ubiquitous pattern of Haldane's rule observed in speciation [1113]. Because the evolution of genetic suppression would make sex-ratio transient on an evolutionary time scale, the uncovering of suppressed sex-ratio mutations requires sophisticated crossing schemes, often between individuals from different populations or incipient species. Perhaps it is because Drosophila geneticists have often studied matings of this type that most of the known examples of sex-ratio are found in Drosophila [6], and new cases continue to be reported regularly [1416].

At least three independent sex-ratio meiotic drive systems have been uncovered in the species D. simulans [15,1720]. To facilitate discussion, we will assign each sex-ratio system a different name according to the location where the original stocks were collected or the research was carried out. In the most thoroughly analyzed case, which we will refer to as the Paris sex-ratio, at least two X-linked distorters have been mapped, and they are currently being characterized at the molecular level [19,21,22]. The Paris sex-ratio (SR) appears to have originated relatively recently, and evolutionary signatures of a recent selective sweep are evident [23]. Multiple suppressors on the autosomes and the Y chromosome have been reported [19,21,24]. Both the distorters and the suppressors are polymorphic across the worldwide distribution of D. simulans [2528]. Cytogenetic studies show that most (92%–96%) of the Y chromosomes in SR males do not undergo normal disjunction during meiosis II. As a consequence, the Y chromosome is often fragmented and lost. Sperm without a Y chromosome do participate in fertilization, and account for the 15%–30% of sterile F1 progeny males observed [29]; however most of the Y-bearing spermatids fail to mature in spermiogenesis [30]. The second sex-ratio system, which we call the Durham sex-ratio, was uncovered by introgressing regions of the third chromosome from D. mauritiana into D. simulans. The gene responsible for the suppression was named too much yin (tmy) [15]. An intriguing observation is that among about 20 hybrid male sterility loci on the third chromosome between these two species, tmy also had the strongest sterilizing effect on hybrid males. This observation provides a direct link between meiotic drive and interspecific hybrid male sterility [15]. The third sex-ratio system, which we call the Winters sex-ratio, was first revealed in interspecific hybrids between D. simulans and D. sechellia, using a D. simulans stock collected in Winters, California [20]. The gene responsible for revealing the sex-ratio is autosomal recessive. It was thought to have been introgressed from D. sechellia into a largely D. simulans genetic background and to have replaced the dominant suppressing D. simulans allele; however, two alternative explanations could not be ruled out. In the first alternative, a cryptic meiotic drive system from D. sechellia may have been introgressed into the D. simulans background and became reactivated. In the second alternative, a sex-ratio system may have been created de novo by an interaction between D. simulans and D. sechellia genes, even though these genes are irrelevant to sex ratio control in their native genomes [20].

Two additional sex-ratio cases have been reported in D. simulans [17,18]. For a case discovered in Brazil, an autosomal recessive mutation was implicated [18]. Similarly, in flies collected in California in 1959 [17], a recessive mutation (sxr) was mapped on the third chromosome. Unfortunately, the stocks of these two cases are no longer available and hence their relationship to the above three systems cannot be ascertained.

Given the frequent observations of sex-ratio and its potential biological significance, it is surprising that no single gene has as yet been identified for any sex-ratio system. Two difficulties prevent a molecular genetic analysis. First, many sex-ratio cases have been found in the genus Drosophila but not yet in natural populations of the model species D. melanogaster. Second, sex-ratio genes are often associated with inversions, making even conventional genetic mapping difficult. In our study we took advantage of the genomic and genetic resources developed in recent years for Drosophila to characterize the Winters sex-ratio system at the molecular level. Evidence for the existence of the other two independent sex-ratio meiotic drive systems in D. simulans will also be elaborated. The study of sex-ratio systems may help us gain new insights into mechanisms of speciation, the maintenance of Mendelian segregation, and the evolutionary principles of genome organization.


A Recessive Mutation of the sex-ratio Suppressor on the Third Chromosome

We first mapped a recessive gene responsible for uncovering the Winters sex-ratio to the vicinity of the locus pe (polytene chromosome position 85A6) on the third chromosome through various crosses by using stocks from a previous study, where the Winters sex-ratio was revealed [20] (Text S1; Figures S1S5). We reasoned that the recessive allele is likely a loss-of-function mutation of a dominant sex-ratio suppressor, rather than corresponding to the distorter itself, because a sex-ratio distorter has no transmission advantage unless it is sex-linked (Figure 1A). A sex-ratio line SSR12-2-7 was constructed by extracting the third chromosome from the stock SSR12 into a pure D. simulans background (Figure S2). This stock was used throughout this study for genetic and phenotypic analyses.


Figure 1. Positional Cloning of not much yang, a Recessive Autosomal sex-ratio Suppressor on the Third Chromosome

(A) A recessive gene on the third chromosome was implicated for uncovering sex-ratio. Through various crossing schemes (see Text S1 for details), chromosomal combinations from sex-ratio (black) and wild-type (white) strains were tested for sex-ratio. In each genotype, bars from left to right represent the X, the second, and the third chromosome, respectively. The bar with a hook represents the Y chromosome. The fourth chromosome was not followed. SR: sex-ratio; WT: wild type (not sex-ratio).

(B) A major gene was mapped between P40 and P38 on the right arm of the third chromosome (3R). Shown here are the 2-P lines used in the mapping, with the blue bars representing the D. mauritiana portion of the introgression lines and the gray triangles representing the P[w+] inserts (see Figure S6 for details). The two bent arrows represent the 84F-93F inversion in D. simulans complex as compared to D. melanogaster. Dotted lines represent ASO markers. The target gene (*) falls within the green region that was subsequently mapped in more detail.

(C) Fine mapping at 1-kb resolution. Fifty P40 and 40 P38 recombinants were found with their crossovers falling in the CG10841–CG31337 region. The positions of these crossovers were delimited with 13 ASO markers. The sex ratio (proportion of female) for each recombinant is shown here in rank order within each ASO interval. Significant among-recombinant variation in sex ratio is indicated (one-way ANOVA: $, p < 5%; $$, p < 1%, and $$$, p < 0.1%). The target major gene (*) is mapped to the 7-kb interval of CG14369–K44.

(D) Two insertions/deletions are responsible for the nmy phenotype. The parental sequences from D. mauritiana w (mau12 Nmy) and D. simulans SSR12-2-7 nmy were amplified by long PCR using the primers k50R30a and k44F30a (arrow heads, see Text S2 for sequences). Empty and filled circles represent a subset of the informative substitutions. The filled rectangles represent the coding sequence of CG14370, which is a single exon gene in D. melanogaster. The sequences between the two filled rectangles, 2,791 bp in mau12 Nmy and 1,427 bp in SSR12-2-7 nmy, are missing in D. melanogaster. The arrow represents the transcription orientation. Dashed lines represent, from left to right, three large deletions of 664, 307, and 388 bp in SSR12-2-7 nmy, respectively. The red arrows stand for inverted repeats (IR) of 380 bp in mau12 Nmy, and a 345-bp homolog in the SSR12-2-7 nmy allele. The green lines represent sequences between the IRs. The last informative 11 recombinants were genotyped with seven ASO probes (nmy135 – nmy7123). Eight of the 11 recombinants (P40.C61 to P38.D29) are shown with their D. mauritiana portions (bars). The three most informative recombinants were sequenced with their crossovers precisely determined. The only difference between P40.B13 Nmy and P40.L12 nmy is the last two insertions/deletions (shaded box).


Further mapping of the sex-ratio suppressor was made possible through a 2-P mapping scheme [15], where the P[w+]-tagged D. mauritiana introgression stocks were constructed for other purposes (mapping hybrid male sterility between D. mauritiana and D. simulans) [31]. The P inserts here conveniently functioned as semi-dominant markers (Figure S6). Their positions and the introgression lines with two P inserts (2-P lines) in the pe region are shown in Figure 1B. The results of the 2-P mapping clearly indicate that the target gene must be localized to a ~2,700-kb interval between P40 and P38 (Figure S6). With allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) markers (Table S2), we genotyped 129 recombinants generated from the 2P-10 line to narrow down the target to an interval of 88 kb between CG10841 and CG31337 (Figure 1C). There are no obvious candidate genes for the sex-ratio suppressor in this region.

To pinpoint the target gene more precisely, we screened an additional 3,100 recombinants within the P40 – P38 interval with 40 P38 and 50 P40 recombinants falling within the 88-kb interval between CG10841 and CG31337 (Figure 1C). Analysis of 79 of these recombinants narrowed the target to the 7-kb interval between CG14369 and K44 region (Figure 1C). In such a small region, it is unlikely that more than one gene is responsible for uncovering the Winters sex-ratio. We named this gene not much yang (nmy). We use the symbol Nmy to denote the dominant suppressing allele in D. simulans and D. mauritiana. The recessive loss-of-function allele that allows the sex-ratio phenotype to be expressed is denoted nmy.

We sequenced the parental chromosomes from D. mauritiana mau12 (Nmy) and D. simulans SSR12-2-7 (nmy) across the CG14369–K44 interval (Figure 1D). From this region, sequences homologous to CG14370 of D. melanogaster were recognized. Insertions of 2,791 bp and 1,427 bp were found in the coding region of CG14370 in mau12 (Nmy) and SSR12-2-7 (nmy), respectively. Notably, a pair of inverted repeats of 380 bp was found in the 2.8-kb Nmy insert, and three large deletions were found in the 1.4-kb nmy insert relative to the 2.8-kb Nmy insert. Because of these deletions, only one repeat remains in the 1.4-kb nmy insert (Figure 1D). The target region was further narrowed down to the 2.3-kb interval of nmy529–nmy2827 by genotyping the last 11 recombinants with seven additional ASO probes that mark the region from nmy135 to nmy7123 (Figure 1D, Table S3). Sequencing showed that the only difference between P40.B13 Nmy and P40.L12 nmy is in the two deletions D307 and D388 (Figure 1D). We conclude that the wild-type function of Nmy as a sex-ratio suppressor will be lost if the pair of inverted repeats in the Nmy insert are not intact. Hereafter, we use brackets to denote the species and length of the insert for the Nmy allele. For example, Nmy[mau2791] and nmy[sim1427] are used to represent the alleles as well as the inserts found in mau12 and SSR12-2-7, respectively.

Gene Structure and Origin of Nmy

We compared the CG14370/Nmy region from several species of the D. melanogaster subgroup. The Nmy inserts are found in D. simulans (four strains) and D. mauritiana (one strain) but not in the other species (one strain each) (Figure 2A). Importantly, we found no Nmy insert in the D. sechellia strain (3588) but two inserts (Nmy[sim2041] and nmy[sim1427]) in the D. simulans strain (sim2). These two strains were used in constructing the D. simulans × D. sechellia recombinant inbred lines where the Winters sex-ratio was first observed [20]. Evidently, the allele nmy[sim1427] does not come from D. sechellia. Rather, it is still segregating in the sim2 strain with a frequency of 6.1% (n = 294). There is an intact inverted-repeat structure within the allele Nmy[sim2041] that has full function as a sex-ratio suppressor (unpublished data). In addition, a null allele of nmy (i.e., CG14370 without any insert) was also found in a local Massachusetts population of D. simulans (unpublished data). Taken together, the evidence indicates that Nmy is a gain-of-function mutation that suppresses the Winters sex-ratio distorter.


Figure 2. The Molecular Structure and Evolution of Nmy

(A) An incomplete survey of Nmy/CG14370 alleles found in species of the D. melanogaster subgroup. CG14370 is a single-exon gene in most species, but various inserts are found in D. simulans and D. mauritiana that represent alleles of Nmy. Arrow: transcription orientation; rectangle: transcripts; filled: coding sequence; empty: untranslated region. The status of translation in D. simulans and D. mauritiana is unclear.

(B) Comparison of the three Nmy inserts found in D. mauritiana and D. simulans. For each allele, solid lines indicate the genomic sequence with various sequence components marked with symbols (e.g., an empty triangle for a 93-bp element). For Nmy[sim2041] and nmy[sim1427]. Partial transcripts of various lengths are shown as rectangles (filled: coding sequence as in CG14370 but with earlier termination; dotted: alternative transcripts). Black arrow indicates transcription orientation. Two likely alternatively spliced introns (I and II) were identified. Possible spurious reverse-transcription products were also indicated (curved dotted line, see Text S3 for more details).

(C) Origin of Nmy inserts by retrotransposition. The cDNA of Dox, Nmy[sim2041], and Nmy[mau2791] are compared and the paralogous regions are highlighted (parallelogram; its twisted form for reverse orientation). The positions of three introns of 57, 63, and 63 bp (vertical broken bar with intron size) and an alternative intron of 91 bp (horizontal green bar) from Dox are shown. Nucleotides at the 5′ ends of the two Nmy alleles and the cDNA of Dox are shown; also shown are the 3′ end of Nmy[sim2041]. Eleven nucleotides, TTGTTTAATTT, near the 3′ end of the Dox transcription were duplicated during the retrotransposition event. The insertion site within CG14370 for the retrotranspostion is also shown. The dinucleotide, TA, before the insertion target (^) was also duplicated, but the nearby tetranucleotides TTGT (underlined) might not be related to the other TTGT (framed). The 3′ end sequences from both Nmy alleles fail to match to the extant cDNA of Dox, but the sequence does match to the genomic regions 114 and 225 bp upstream of Dox, respectively (dotted lines with the number of 114 or 225). The left-hand inverted repeat IR' was most likely generated as a secondary duplication after the retrotransposition event.

(D) Both Nmy[sim2041] and Nmy[mau2791] evolved from a common retrotransposed sequence of Dox. Upper: Homologous sequences of 1,467 bp among Dox, Nmy[sim2041], and Nmy[mau2791] were used to construct a star phylogeny with the number of single nucleotide substitutions as well as the three insertions/deletions of 1–3 nucleotides (D3, D3, and D1) mapped on the branches. Lower: Homologous sequences of 345 bp among the two inverted repeats of Nmy[sim2041], Nmy[mau2791], and Dox were used to construct another star phylogeny. The four inverted repeat sequences are essentially identical except for a 6-bp deletion (D6) in IR' of Nmy[sim2041], and two nucleotide substitutions in IR'' of Nmy[mau2791].


The three Nmy inserts are compared in Figure 2B. The length of a single inverted repeat in Nmy[mau2791] is 35 bp longer than that in Nmy[sim2041]. The sequences between the inverted repeats in these two Nmy alleles are not homologous, except for a 93-bp element found in reverse orientation. There is a 664-bp fragment (D664 in Figure 2B) in Nmy[mau2791] that is absent in the two D. simulans alleles. The allele nmy[sim1427] was derived from Nmy[sim2041] by the loss of one inverted repeat and the loss of most of the sequence located between the inverted repeats, except for the 93-bp element in reverse orientation. This observation again suggests that the inverted-repeat structure is essential for the sex-ratio suppression function. Nmy does not appear to be a conventional gene (Figure 2B). Both ends of the transcripts across the Nmy[sim2041] or nmy[sim1427] region were determined by 5′ and 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) and they are identical to those of CG14370 found in D. melanogaster. The full length of the mRNA from nmy[sim1427] was determined, and two alternately spliced introns (I, II) were identified (Figure 2B). We failed, however, to obtain the internal sequences of mRNA from Nmy[sim2041], because the reverse transcription was evidently stalled, most likely by a stem-loop secondary structure formed between the inverted repeats (see Text S3). The coding potential is limited for transcripts from both nmy[sim1427] and Nmy[sim2041] because of the premature termination of the CG14370 open reading frame (ORF) (Figure 2B). Although we cannot rule out the existence of other functional ORFs in the Nmy[sim2041] transcripts, it seems more plausible that the stem-loop structure is functional and essential as a suppressor. We predict that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) generated from this stem-loop structure would contain the information that is necessary for the specificity of suppression.

Further evidence for a possible siRNA mechanism comes from the mapping and cloning of a sex-ratio distorter on the X chromosome (Dox). Dox is a novel gene that is responsible for the Winters sex-ratio distortion, whereas Nmy suppresses Dox and results in a normal sex ratio [32]. Sequence comparisons strongly suggest that Nmy originated from part of Dox through retrotransposition (Figure 2C). The retrotransposition event is evident by the following observations. First, there is a tandem duplication of the dinucleotide (TA) at the insertion site within CG14370, and 11 base pairs (TTGTTTAATTT) that are proximal to the 5′ end of the Dox cDNA are also duplicated in the 5′ end of the Nmy insert. These two duplications are the telltale signs of a retrotransposition event through a target-primed reverse transcription mechanism, which are possibly catalyzed by some non–long terminal repeat type retrotransposon [3335]. Second, the three introns of Dox, with lengths of 57, 63, and 63 bp, respectively, are not found in Nmy. On the other hand, it is unclear whether the precursor mRNA in the retrotransposition event was a bona fide transcript of Dox, because the 3′ end of the Nmy inserts matches to genomic region 100–200 bp upstream from Dox. There are several explanations for this discrepancy. First, the 5′ end of an alternative Dox transcript may have been missed in our 5′ RACE experiments. Second, the evolutionary precursor of the current Dox might have a longer transcript. Third, the Nmy insert may derive from a longer and aberrant transcript from Dox.

Sequence comparisons support further inferences about the molecular evolution of the Nmy gene. Other than the left-most inverted repeat (IR' in Figure 2C), sequences of Nmy and the cDNA from Dox are largely colinear, implying that IR' originated as a secondary duplication after the retrotransposition. Many nucleotide substitutions are shared by Nmy[sim2041] and Nmy[mau2791], although each also has its unique substitutes. This observation suggests that these two alleles shared a common ancestor before the split between D. simulans and D. mauritiana. Even though there are some gross sequence changes along the two Nmy lineages, their homologous sites have only minor differences (3/1,467bp) relative to their divergence from the Dox sequence (Figure 2D). Furthermore, the inverted repeats from all alleles are virtually identical, again suggesting the functional importance of the stem-loop secondary structure (Figure 2D).

Etiology of the Winters sex-ratio: Abnormal Spermatogenesis

Distorted sex ratio can be caused by a number of mechanisms, including male-specific lethality, phenotypic sex reversal, or a deficiency of functional Y-bearing sperm. We inferred abnormalities in spermatogenesis from a cross of sex-ratio males with C(1)RM y w females, where the Y-bearing sperm are transmitted to female progeny. Progeny from this cross show a male biased sex ratio, implying a deficiency of functional Y-bearing sperm from sex-ratio males (Table 1). In another cross of sex-ratio males to females carrying the X-linked marker forked (f), no f female progeny were ever observed, ruling out the feminization of XY males to phenotypic females as the cause of the female-biased sex ratio (Table 1). Additionally, survival rates from egg to adult in the progeny of sex-ratio males are not different from controls, confirming earlier suggestion that male-specific lethality is not the cause of sex-ratio (Table S4) [20].


Table 1.

Sex-ratio Is Not Caused by a Zygotic Problem


A lack of functional Y-bearing sperm could be caused by failure in development, motility, or ability to fertilize. To distinguish among these possibilities, we exploited the temperature sensitivity of the Winters sex-ratio. In particular, at 18 °C, the sex ratio in progeny of nmy males can reach as high as 93%, whereas at 25 °C, the sex ratio decreases to about 60% (Figure 3A). The age of the males has a much smaller but also significant effect on the sex ratio. In experiments carried out in such a way that each functional sperm was maximized in its chance of fertilization, we estimated that a nmy male produces about as many sperm as a simB male does at room temperature or 25 °C, but produces less than half as many functional sperm at 18 °C (Figure 3A). To assess whether any reproductive process taking place in females contributes to the sex ratio distortion, we carried out an experiment in which Nmy and nmy males and females reared at two temperatures (18 °C and 25 °C) were mated, and the F1 progeny were reared separately at these two temperatures (Figure 3B). The resulting sex ratio depended only on the temperature at which the parental males were reared, suggesting that spermatogenesis, not sperm competition and/or fertilization, is the stage where the etiology of the sex-ratio happens.


Figure 3. The Expression of sex-ratio Is Temperature Sensitive during Spermatogenesis

(A) The expression of sex-ratio is temperature sensitive. The sex ratio and size of progeny of SSR12-2-7 nmy or simB Nmy (control) males at various ages are shown. “Sperm exhaustion” experiments were done at three temperatures: 18 (± 0.5)°C, room temperature (22 ± 1.0°C), and 25 (± 0.5)°C. Every 3 d, single SSR12-2-7 nmy or simB Nmy males were provided with three w; e virgin females, and the mated w; e females were transferred to fresh vials. The procedure was repeated until the females were no longer fertile. In this fashion, progeny number (mean ± SEM per male) serves as a proxy for the number of functional sperm. The overall sex ratio (k) trend with age (x) is also shown (k = ax + b; n = males tested; p = significance test for the hypothesis a = 0). A significant age effect on sex-ratio was detected at all three temperatures (k = 0.00383x + 0.771; p = 0.046 for SSR12-2-7 nmy at room temperature if the last data point is excluded). The expressivity of sex-ratio is inversely correlated with the temperature. SSR12-2-7 nmy males were as fertile as simB at room tempreature and 25 °C (t-test, p = 0.729 and 0.08, respectively), but they were significantly lower in fertility at 18°C (p = 0.002).

(B) The temperature sensitivity of sex-ratio is restricted to spermatogenesis. In this “temperature combination” experiment, pairs of 2-d-old virgin males (SSR12-2-7 nmy or simB Nmy) and females (w; e), reared at either 18 °C or 25 °C, were monitored for copulation up to 8 h at room temperature (22 ± 1 °C). Immediately after copulation, the male was aspirated away while the female was cultured at either 18 °C or 25 °C. These mated females were transferred to fresh vials every 3 d until the females became sterile. Seven to 25 males were tested for each of the 16 combinations of factors (genotype and temperature). The results (sex-ratio ± SEM) are shown as columns, and error bars with the sample sizes are also indicated. A generalized linear model was used for analysis of variance (SAS PROC GENMOD). Only the temperature at which males were reared had a significant effect on the observed sex-ratio (p < 0.0001), while the other two temperatures at which the females and the progeny were reared have no effect (p = 0.5703 and 0.3021, respectively).


Cytological Evidence for Failure of the Y-Bearing Sperm Maturation

An ultrastructural study of spermatogenesis from Nmy and nmy males further narrowed the etiology of sex-ratio to abnormal spermiogenesis. Normal spermiogenesis follows an elaborate program of nuclear elongation, microtubule assembly and depolymerization, chromatin condensation, elimination of excess nuclear envelope and neoplasm, and individualization at the final stage [3638]. During this process, a vast majority (>99%) of the nuclear content is eliminated as waste, and the microtubules perform essential cytoskeletal and transport functions [38]. Abnormalities in various stages of spermiogenesis in nmy males are evident (Figure 4). In early spermiogenesis, the individual mitochondria aggregate and fuse to form two giant interleaved structures (the onion stage, or nebenkern). Normally, the nuclei appear to be filled with a homogeneously fine granulofibrillar material, punctuated with occasional coarse granules and a prominent protein body [39]. However, the mutant spermatid nuclei start to accumulate nucleoplasmic vacuoles at the late onion stage. This is the earliest morphological abnormality that might be associated with malfunctions in spermiogenesis (Figure 4A and 4B).


Figure 4. Abnormal Nuclear Transformation of the Y-Bearing Sperm

Ultrastructural studies of sperm nuclear transformation and individualization in wild-type simB Nmy males (A, C, E, G, I) as compared with SSR12-2-7 nmy males (B, D, F, H, J) at 16 °C. All scale bars represent 500 nm.

(A and B) Onion stage. The earliest abnormalities are detected as nucleoplasmic vacuoles (*) at the onion stage in the nuclei (N) of nmy (B) but not of Nmy (A) males. The grainy protein body, likely the nucleolus (nu) and the spherical nebenkern (NK), appear to be normal.

(C and D) Elongation period. Normally, the nucleoplasm (N) is homogenous, and several rows of microtubules are aligned along the fenestrated portion of the nuclear membrane (arrowheads). A sheath of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) surrounds the nucleus (arrow). In nmy males, some nuclei at this stage have very pronounced nucleoplasmic vacuoles (*), as if the elimination of excess nucleoplasm through the fenestrated side has failed, although the alignment of microtubules is apparently normal (arrowheads, D). On the other hand, some nuclei appear normal, and show a reduced volume compared to the abnormal nuclei (N in D), suggesting some nucleoplasm has already been eliminated.

(E and F) Post-elongation period. By the end of this period, the chromatin has been homogeneously condensed and most of the nuclear envelope has been eliminated (E). Meanwhile, arrays of microtubules (arrowheads in lower left insert) have become rigidly organized around the nuclei. However, the nuclear condensation process has been disrupted in many nmy nuclei, in which the nucleoplasmic vacuoles apparently block the condensation progress (* for examples shown in F). Note that nuclear condensation is always accompanied by apposed rows of microtubules (arrowheads in lower left insert of F), lack of which seems to correspond to failed chromatin condensation and the subsequent rupture of nuclear envelope nearby.

(G–J) Individualization process. A cystic bulge is initiated at the head region and traverses through the entire length of the spermatid cyst. During this process, excess nucleoplasm, nuclear envelope, and syncytial bridges between spermatids are squeezed away into the waste bag (G). In a cross section through the cystic bulge near the head region, fenestrated (*), and nonfenestrated (#) nuclear envelopes are seen in the process of elimination. One axonemal complex is marked with “v”. For the nuclear head (N in G) that the cystic bulge has already passed, note the absence of surrounding microtubules. (I) In this cross section through the tail region after individualization, 62 spermatid tails are each invested in its own membrane and well separated. One abnormal tail is also seen (arrow). The other three of the 64 tails may have already been eliminated into the waste bag. (H) Nucleoplasmic vacuoles (*) within an abnormal spermatid are squeezed into the tail region, apparently causing physical difficulty for the cystic bulge to pass through. This may explain why individualization cannot proceed through for a cluster of 13 tails (arrow in J), while the other 46 tails appear normal. The other five of the 64 tails were probably eliminated into the waste bag. Also shown in (G) and (H) are some notable structural components within an axonemal complex including basal body (BB), major mitochondrial derivative (MM), minor mitochondrial derivative (mM), and paracrystalline body (PB).


In the subsequent elongation period, the nuclear envelope has already been demarcated into two well-defined areas, fenestrated and nonfenestrated. In the early stage of elongation, the fenestrated portion of the nuclear envelope is apposed to rows of microtubules running parallel to the elongating axis (Figure 4C). In the following periods, the microtubules migrate from the fenestrated to the nonfenestrated areas, at the same time that chromatin condensation begins on the nonfenestrated side. Along with the continuing nuclear condensation, much of the nuclear envelope and excess nucleoplasm are eliminated. The end product is a highly packed lanceolate nucleus, which is only about 1/200 of the original size. It is believed that the microtubules play essential roles in the process of chromatin condensation by performing transport and support functions [40] (Figure 4E). In nmy genotypes, some spermatid nuclei develop nucleoplasmic vacuoles that become very large in the early elongation stage. Because the rows of microtubules appear to be normal (Figure 4D), the failed transport across the nuclear envelope is not likely caused by microtubule malfunctions. In other words, it is more likely a failed process within the nuclei (e.g., chromatin packaging) that underlies the formation of the nucleoplasmic vacuoles. Later in the post-elongation period, these vacuoles may cause rupture of the nuclear envelope when forces generated from the microtubule arrays as well as from chromatin condensation exert a strong pressure on it (Figure 4F).

As an apparent consequence of the failed chromatin condensation, the sperm individualization process in nmy males is also perturbed. Normally, the individualization complex (IC) is initiated at the head region of the spermatid bundle and traverses along the entire length of the bundle. Concomitant with the passing of the IC, excess nucleoplasm, nuclear envelope, syncytial bridges, and degenerated spermatids are stripped off and collected in the waste bag. Each individual spermatid becomes invested in its own membrane [36] (Figure 4G and 4I). In nmy males, the nucleoplasmic vacuoles are prominently present in the IC, likely blocking its passage through the tails (Figure 4H). These abnormal tails remain in the syncytium, while the rest of the tails are individualized and separated (Figure 4J).

Counts of abnormal and normal nuclei or tails in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs from testes developed at 16 °C or 26 °C are shown in Table 2. During sectioning, the grids were prepared from sections at least 10 μm apart to avoid sampling the same nuclei for imaging, whereas only one grid from each testis was used for the tail images. The average number of heads per bundle observed was much lower than the possible 64, in part because perfectly perpendicular sections through the heads of a spermatid bundle are rare. It is however noteworthy that the average number of heads (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM] = 19.1 ± 1.0 per bundle, n = 80) from 16 °C nmy male is significantly fewer than that from control (27.4 ± 2.0, n = 51) (t-test, p < 0.001), suggesting the bundles in nmy males are less tightly packed in the head region because of the many big heads inflated by the large nucleoplasmic vacuoles (Figure 4D). For nmy males raised at 16 °C, neither the percentages of abnormal heads (25.2% ± 1.4%, n = 80) nor that of tails (30.6% ± 3.1%, n = 39) is sufficient to account for the biased sex ratio of 97.0%, because the maximum sex ratio would be 71.9% and 66.5%, respectively, assuming that all abnormal sperm are Y-bearing and the maximum sex ratio being calculated as 0.5 × (abnormal + normal)/normal. This discrepancy suggests that many Y-carrying spermatids with normal appearance in TEM were nonfunctional. For nmy males raised at 26 °C, there were very few abnormal heads and tails observed, consistent with the slight bias in sex ratio.


Table 2.

Spermatid Dimorphism Observed through TEM


Under the fluorescence light microscope, the earliest sign of abnormal nuclear transformation can be detected in the elongation stage but not in the onion stage (Figure 5A–5C). After slight fixation and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, it is very easy to spread spermatid heads within a bundle. The dimorphism in nuclear transformation becomes very clear for nmy males developed at 16 °C but is attenuated with increasing temperature. Reared at 26 °C, nmy males have hardly any abnormal nuclei (Figure 5B–5E and Table 3). The correlation between predicted sex ratio and the sex ratio observed is highly significant (r2 = 0.931, p = 0.0078). The high correlation implies that most if not all of the abnormally developed spermatids are Y-bearing.


Figure 5. Abnormal Transformation of the Y-Bearing Sperm Detected by DAPI Staining

(A) Onion stage (SSR12-2-7 nmy, 16 °C) similar to that in Figure 4A and 4B. Abnormal nucleoplasmic vacuoles are not visible under the fluorescence microscope. Nucleus (N) and nebenkern (NK) are indicated. Scale bar: 20 μm.

(B and C) Spermatids of SSR12-2-7 nmy have strong dimorphism in nuclear transformation at 16 °C (C) as compared with simB Nmy (B).

(D and E) The nuclear dimorphism of SSR12-2-7 nmy disappears at 26 °C (E) as compared to simB Nmy (D). Scale bar for B-E: 10 μm.


Table 3.

Spermatid Dimorphism Observed after DAPI Staining


Failure of the Y-bearing Sperm Maturation: Evidence from the Temperature Shift Experiments

Are the abnormalities observed at the onion stage the primary developmental lesion of nmy? In Drosophila spermatogenesis, many mutant phenotypes appear to be similar even though the underlying mutations (primary lesions) have dramatic differences in their normal functions [41]. In this case we took advantage of the temperature-sensitivity to detect the primary lesion under the assumption that it is also sensitive to temperature. In temperature-shift experiments, where the chance of mixing early and late sperm is small and the stages of spermatogenesis can be cytologically determined (see Materials and Methods), the critical developmental stages in spermatogenesis can be inferred directly from the sex ratio data (Figures 6 and 7). Up to the early elongation stage, the abnormal nucleoplasmic vacuoles formed at 18 °C can be eliminated by a temperature shift to 25 °C (Figure 7A), whereas a temperature shift is no longer effective after full elongation has been reached (Figure 7B–7D). For the shifts to lower temperature, 18 °C can still cause sex ratio distortion even if the nuclei have reached the middle elongation stage (Figure E), but a switch to 18 °C has little effect once individualization has commenced (Figure 7F–7L). These observations unambiguously agree with the electron microscopy data that the earliest detectable developmental lesions are indeed the abnormal nucleoplasmic vacuoles and that they have a deleterious effect in disrupting nuclear condensation. We do not know what upstream biochemical processes are involved, but chromatin modulation and traffic across the nuclear envelope are among the primary suspects.


Figure 6. Temperature-Shift Experiment

At various time points during development from eggs to adults, vials of SSR12-2-7 (nmy) flies were shifted from 18 °C to 25 °C (A) or from 25 °C to 18 °C (B). Seven to 32 males eclosed from each of these vials were tested for sex-ratio, and the results (sex ratio and error bar = SEM) are shown at the time points of temperature shift. The stages of spermatogenesis at critical points (A–L) were examined cytologically (see Figure 7 for the corresponding images).


Figure 7. Critical Stage for Temperature Sensitivity

Five spermatid bundles of the most advanced stage from each of the five gonads or testes were examined at each critical point of the temperature shift experiment under phase contrast optics (A–F) or epifluorescence (G–L). Spermatid development stages (p to s) were classified according to the standard described in [41]. Scale bar: 10 μm (A–F); 100 μm (G–I); 20 μm (J–L).

(A–D) Spermatogenesis at 18 °C before the early middle stage of elongation (stages p or q) can be rescued for sex-ratio by shifting to 25 °C (A; also see Figure 6). However, when spermatogenesis reaches late middle stage of elongation (stage r), the rescue is almost impossible (B–D). Thus, stage r is the late boundary of temperature sensitivity. Note the phase dark nucleoplasmic vacuoles in the abnormal nuclei (arrow) as compared to normal nuclear transformation (arrowhead). (E and F) Spermatogenesis at 25 °C up to the middle stage of elongation (stages q and r) can be affected by 18 °C treatment to give full sex-ratio (E). However, the temperature sensitivity decreases once the spermatogenesis reaches the fully elongated stage (stage s) (F).

(G–L) Individualization complex (IC) is viewed with Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin that binds to F-actin (green) while the nuclei are marked by DAPI (blue). By the beginning of individualization (arrow in I and J, where J is a closeup of I; compared to a younger bundle in which the IC has not formed yet, arrowhead), the 18 °C treatment can only cause a slight sex ratio distortion (Figure 6B). On the 8th day of spermatogenesis at 25 °C, there are numerous spermatid bundles that have initiated individualization (K) or that have the IC traversing along the tails (L). The 18 °C treatment has no effect from this time on.



We have presented genetic, molecular, and cytological data characterizing the suppression of the Winters sex-ratio in D. simulans. We have shown that the Winters sex-ratio is polymorphic within natural populations of D. simulans, and that it has no relation to D. sechellia as previously thought. The etiology of the aberrant sex-ratio is attributed to the failure of nuclear condensation in the Y-bearing sperm. We mapped and cloned an autosomal suppressor that acts to suppress a sex-ratio distorter on the X chromosome. The nucleotide sequence and structure of the suppressor strongly suggests a mechanism involving siRNAs. Remarkably, the evolutionary origin of the suppressor is from a transcript of the sex-ratio distorter gene itself. Our work supports the theory that intragenomic conflicts are important evolutionary processes that may ultimately underlie several seemingly unrelated major biological phenomena including Mendelian segregation, genome organization and speciation.

One Species, Three Systems (At Least)

The cases of sex-ratio recorded in D. simulans can be recognized as at least three independent systems, as highlighted below.

Paris versus Winters.

For the Paris system, two epistatic distorters have been implicated in the sn–lz region [22], which is adjacent to but not overlapping the lz–v region where the Winters distorter (Dox) has been localized [32]. Other evidence also suggests an older evolutionary age for the Winters system, as detailed in [32].

Winters versus Durham.

Tmy has been mapped to 89A4 and cloned (YT, unpublished data). It is at different location and has a different sequence than that of Nmy (87F3). Furthermore, Tmy does not suppress Dox (crosses 37 versus 39 in Table S1).

Paris versus Durham.

Neither does Tmy suppress SR6, an X chromosome carrying the Paris distorters [32].

These observations suggest that all three sex-ratio systems are distinct. We cannot exclude some evolutionary connections among them that genetic tests so far have failed to reveal. Nonetheless, these observations strongly suggest that genetic variations of sex-ratio are not rare, at least in D. simulans. Although one search for genetic variation affecting sex ratio in D. melanogaster was negative [42], positive results in the same species have been reported [43,44]. Some X-linked mutations distorting sex ratio can be readily generated through mutagenesis in D. melanogaster [45,46], but for reasons that are unknown, no clear case of sex-ratio has ever been found in natural populations of this species.

The recessive mutant (sxr) might well be allelic to nmy. This gene can be placed 26.6 cM distal to H (74.2) and 34.0 cM proximal to pe (121.4), i.e., in the vicinity of Ubx (90.3) on one genetic map [47]. Thus sxr seems to fall in roughly the same region as nmy (Figure 1B, also see Table 6 in [17]). The phenotypes of sxr also appear to be very similar to nmy in several respects, including temperature sensitivity and abnormal morphology in spermiogenesis [17]. At the ultrastructural level, sxr spermatogenesis showed pronounced sperm tail degeneration [48], as we report here for nmy (Figure 4J).

On the other hand, some phenotypes of sxr were described differently from those of nmy reported here. One major discrepancy is in the temperature-sensitive stage, which was inferred to be the primary spermatocyte for sxr and nuclear transformation for nmy. The determination of the sxr temperature-sensitive stage could be somewhat discrepant, because the temperature-shift protocol used does not stage spermatogenesis with great precision. In addition, the time course of spermatogenesis inferred for D. simulans was not based on direct cytological examination but was assumed to be the same as that in D. melanogaster [17]. Under TEM, sxr males showed abnormalities in the primary spermatocytes and in the axonemal complex before the individualization stage [48], but nmy males did not show these defects, even when special attention was given to these possibilities. In any event, if sxr and nmy are indeed the same gene, the mutation likely has maintained stable frequency in natural populations of California for many decades.

The Evolution of sex-ratio Suppressor

Intragenomic conflicts are struggles within a genome over hereditary transmission [49]. Meiotic drive is one type of intragenomic conflict in that the driving allele or haplotype has more than 50% representation in next generation. For nuclear genes that freely recombine the evolutionary stable strategy is exact Mendelian segregation [8]. Thus for most of the genome, there is strong evolutionary pressure for selecting modifiers that increase the fidelity of Mendelian segregation. This explains why segregation in meiosis is usually Mendelian, and it also underlies Fisher's argument about the sex ratio based on parental expenditure [8]. However, this logic does not apply to cases where free recombination is inhibited. For example, in the two classic cases of autosomal meiotic drive—Segregation Distortion (SD) in D. melanogaster [50] and the t- complex in Mus musculus [51]— the distorter(s) and insensitive responder(s) are locked together within complex inversions. Similarly, the evolution of sex-linked meiotic drive is facilitated by the lack of recombination between the X and the Y chromosomes. It has been reasoned that sex-ratio meiotic drive is a more potent evolutionary force than autosomal drive, based on two arguments [11,12]. First, sex-ratio drive can evolve more readily. When the sex chromosomes do not undergo recombination along most of their length, which includes most cases of heteromorphic sex chromosomes, many sex-linked genes can potentially mutate to sex-ratio distorter. This is usually not true for an autosomal distorter, because the precondition for its invasion is satisfied only in special circumstances, such as in the centromeric region with its reduced recombination or within inversions. Second, sex-ratio has a much greater effect on the rest of genome precisely because it affects the sex ratio, and thus, the transmission rates of different genomic compartments. In addition to favoring modifiers that reduce any fitness cost, sex-ratio favors modifiers that render the sex ratio more equal, as mandated by Fisher's principle [52]. The evolutionary cycle of distorter and suppressor could go on indefinitely as long as new sex-ratio mutations unaffected by existing suppressors can occur.

When a sex-ratio mutation invades a population, its fate can be fixation, stable polymorphism, or extinction, depending on the configuration of fitness components (particularly the fitness of sex-ratio males) [53]. Polymorphisms of distorters and suppressors have been reported in several Drosophila species, including D. simulans [25], D. quinaria [54,55], D. obscura [56], D. paramelanica [57], and D. mediopunctata [5860]. Fixation of a suppressor is likely the case for the cryptic sex-ratio suppressor Tmy in D. simulans [15]. However, no sex-ratio suppressors have been found in D. pseudoobscura, and the cause may be related to high fitness cost of sex-ratio males [61,62]. It is remarkable in itself that modifiers that increase the fitness of sex-ratio males seem not to have been selected for the past 0.7–1.3 My [63]. The answer may lie in the molecular mechanism of this sex-ratio distorter that is still unknown. Molecular characterization of the Winters sex-ratio system makes possible future studies on the molecular population genetics and ecological dynamics of suppressors in natural populations.

The Molecular Mechanism of sex-ratio and Its Evolutionary Impact

We have shown here that an RNAi mechanism is likely involved in the Winters sex-ratio suppression. Remarkably, the suppressor Nmy was generated through the use of the sequence information of the Dox distorter itself by means of retrotransposition. An interesting observation is that the abnormal transformation of the Y-bearing sperm in Dox;nmy male is exacerbated at lower temperature. If a lack of small RNAs encoded by the nmy allele is indeed the cause for derepressing the expression of Dox, then the molecules encoded by Dox (RNA or protein) may be more harmful to the Y-bearing sperm at lower temperature. Further in-depth molecular analysis of this hypothesis is required. This Dox-Nmy system is reminiscent of a possible case of cryptic sex-ratio system Ste/Su(Ste) in D. melanogaster [64,65]. The distorter Ste and the suppressor Su(Ste) share common sequences, and an RNAi mechanism has been convincingly shown to be responsible for the suppression [66,67].

The cytological defects in nmy are also reminiscent of abnormal nuclear condensation in the classical meiotic drive system SD in D. melanogaster [50]. The gene Sd targets the Responder (Rsp) locus and causes degeneration of Rsp-bearing sperm [68]. The Sd-bearing sperm is thus transmitted to more than 95% of the progeny from Sd/Rsp males. Sd is a truncated duplication of RanGAP and is still enzymatically active [69,70]. It may cause problems in establishing a normal RanGTP–RanGDP gradient across the nuclear envelope [71], which is a critical condition for many cytological functions including transport of small RNAs [72]. The Rsp locus consists of a cluster of satellite repeats whose sensitivity is proportional to copy number [73]. One might speculate that an interruption of heterochromatin condensation in and around the Rsp cluster directly causes the degeneration of Rsp-bearing sperm, because normal heterochromatin regulation requires small RNAs homologous to the heterochromatic region [74], whereas small RNAs originating and/or targeting the Rsp cluster may be misregulated in Sd/Rsp males. Indeed, small RNAs originated from the Rsp locus have been recorded [75].

Segregation distortion in males may happen at either meiotic or post-meiotic stages. For example, the Y chromosome can be fragmented or lost during meiosis II [29,76], or the Y-carrying spermatids may not mature [77,78]. Post-meiotic failure in spermiogenesis can result from aberrations in meiosis. For example, failure of X-Y pairing during prophase of meiosis I has been shown to cause spermiogenic failure in D. melanogaster [77,79]. For the Winters sex-ratio, it is unclear whether there is any pairing problem between the sex chromosomes, and whether chromosomal behavior during meiosis is normal. Through light and electron microscopy, we have demonstrated that the primary lesion in nmy mutants is a defect in nuclear condensation during spermiogenesis. In any case, segregation distortion in males usually results from a failure to produce a class of sperm, or a failure of a class of sperm to function, and there is a concomitant reduction in fertility.

Whatever the actual molecular mechanisms or developmental stages involved, it is logical to make an evolutionary link between sex-ratio meiotic drive and speciation. A meiotic drive distorter first exploits the meiotic and post-meiotic mechanisms for the biased transmission of itself, then the genome regains balanced transmission through the evolution of suppressors that correct the meiotic or post-meiotic aberrations. During each episode of distortion and suppression, male fertility might be compromised and recovered. Because of these dynamics, the meiotic/post-meiotic genes have an accelerated rate of evolution, thus promoting the reproductive isolation among isolated populations or incipient species that do not share common distorters and suppressors [13]. Under this meiotic drive scenario, it is easy to explain two ubiquitously observed genetic patterns for postzygotic reproductive isolation: a much faster accumulation of hybrid male sterility among Drosophila species, and a “large X” effect for the distribution of the hybrid male sterility genes [13]. Two Drosophila cases where one gene expresses both hybrid male sterility and sex-ratio lends direct support to a role for meiotic drive in speciation [14,15]. A testable prediction is that genes that are responsible for the initial postzygotic reproductive isolation between species most likely function in meiotic and post-meiotic processes such as chromosome segregation and chromatin condensation.

Materials and Methods

Fly stocks.

Five NSR (normal sex ratio) lines (IG88, IG113, IG118, IG132, and IG143) and six SSR (skewed sex ratio) lines (IG12, IG33, IG54, IG151, IG73, and Q15.3) were used from a previous D. simulans × D. schellia hybridization in which the parental D. simulans stock, sim2, had been collected in Winters, California [20]. The D. mauritiana × D. simulans introgression lines have been described before [13,31]. The following lines were used in this study: homozygous introgression line P18.16 and P38.7 and heterozygous line P40.6. The heterozygous 2-P lines were made by recombining two P[w+] inserts in cis from two introgression lines: 2P-10 (P40.8 × P38.4), 2P-20 (P37.1 × P35.2), 2P-19 (P37.3 × P38.5), 2P-17 (P35.2 × P46.17), and 2P-15 (P38.1 × P46.17). The expression of the w+ allele affecting eye color in P[w+] is sensitive to its position and copy number. Essentially, these P[w+] inserts provide semi-dominant markers along the third chromosome in D. simulans.

A D. simulans stock with the multiply marked third chromosome jv st e pe has been described before [80]. These mutations and their genetic positions are javelin 3–19.2, scarlet 3–49.5, ebony 3–63.0, and peach 3–104.9 [81]. They are allelic to D. melanogaster mutations javelin 3–19.2, 65A5-E1 [82], scarlet 3–44.0, 73A3 [82], ebony 3–70.7, 93C7-D1 [47], and pink 3–48.0, 85A6 [82], respectively. Note that because there is a large inversion 84F-94F on 3R in D. simulans as compared with D. melanogaster, the map positions of e pe in D. simulans are reversed on the map of D. melanogaster. Other D. simulans stocks simB (w; nt; III) and w; e have been described before [31]; and C(1)RM y w/lzS was kindly provided by J. Coyne.

Fly work.

All flies were reared on cornmeal-molasses-agar medium sprinkled with yeast grains at room temperature (22 ± 1 °C) if not otherwise indicated. The sex-ratio phenotype of a male was scored by mating the male with three tester virgin females, usually of the stock w; e, for 7 d before clearing all adults. The progeny were sexed and counted three times until the 19th day. The sex ratio (k) was calculated as the proportion of females.

Molecular biology.

The use of ASO markers was described previously [31]. Some key techniques and the reagents/kits used are as follows: long PCR (Takara LA Taq); PCR product cloning (Topo TA and Topo XL PCR cloning kits, Invitrogen); sequencing of large DNA fragment (EZ-Tn5 Insertion Kit, Epicentre); phage genomic library of D. simulans simB (Lambda ZAP II vector predigested with EcoR I, stratagene); RNA isolation (TRIZOL Reagent, Invitrogen); RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) (3′ and 5′- RACE kits and SuperScirpt II Reverse Transcriptase, Invitrogen).

Light microscopy.

Testes or gonads from crawling larvae or young adult males were dissected into saline (0.7% NaCl). Spermatids or mature sperm were released from gonads/testes with a fine tungsten needle. Live specimens were observed directly under phase contrast. For a reliable count of abnormal spermatids, the specimens were fixed for 20 s to 1 min on a microscope slide with 10 μl 2% glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (2.7 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl, 8.0 mM KH2PO4); and rinsed with PBS for 5 min before staining with DAPI (100 ng/ml in PBST–0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 5 min. The specimens were spread with vigorous tapping on the cover slip before being observed under epifluorescence. To visualize the IC [83], an additional step was added in the above protocol: fixed specimens were rinsed for 5 min in PBSTB (PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA) and stained 10 min with Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin (10 μ/ml; Invitrogen). The specimens were rinsed again for 3 min with PBSTB before DAPI staining. For longer storage, specimens were mounted in SlowFade Gold (Invitrogen). Images were taken on an Axioskop2 or Leica DMRB with digital camera, and processed with Adobe Photoshop.


In a drop of chilled 0.067 M pH 7.4 phosphate buffer, testes and accessory glands were dissected from young males (1–3 d old) with a fine tungsten needle and were transferred immediately to 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.067 M phosphate buffer on ice. The specimens were fixed for 2 h at 4 °C in 1% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.067 M phosphate buffer, followed by a post-fixation of 1 h in 2% OsO4 at 4 °C. The specimens were treated with 1% uranyl acetate at room temperature for 1 h before processing through an ethanol series to dehydrate. The specimens were trimmed after ethanol dehydration so that only one of each pair of testes was used in embedding. The Epon resin was made by mixing Taab Epon (42.4 g), DDSA (19.8 g), and NMA (18.0 g) for 30 min before adding 1.9 g DMP-30. Before final embedding, each testis was cut into 4–5 segments and aligned on the bottom of the mold in a straight line with the apical tip facing out. Sections were cut on a Reichert ultracut-S microtome, followed by staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were observed with a Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN electron microscope.

Temperature shift experiments.

Vials with SSR12-2-7 (nmy) eggs collected at 25 °C were cultured at 18 °C or 25 °C and shifted to the other temperature at time points of 0.5 or 2 d apart (0.5 d for the more critical stages) until adult flies emerged. The first few males after eclosion from each vial were singly mated to ten w; e 2-d-old virgins, which were adequate to exhaust the sperm of a single male (unpublished data). Each male was aspirated to new vials containing 10 virgin females every day for 3–5 d. Offspring from each vial were counted, but only those from the first vials were used in data analysis once their total reached over 50. On average, 148 and 108 offspring per male were used for calculating the sex ratio for the 18 °C to 25 °C shift and the 25 °C to 18 °C shift, respectively. In this way the first batch of sperm developing from the first few sperm bundles were exhausted and assayed. Critical intervals that were sensitive to temperature were detected from the change in sex ratio. Furthermore, the spermatogenetic stages of the first most mature bundles at these sensitive intervals were determined cytologically, either through phase contrast optics as described in D. melanogaster [41], or using Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin for viewing the individualization complex [83].

Supporting Information

Figure S1. The Gene Responsible for sex-ratio Is Recessive and Maps to the Third Chromosome

SSR12 expresses sex ratio distortion while Cy; Antp does not. However, this experiment does not rule out the possibility that the expression of sex-ratio is conditioned on the presence of the X and/or the second chromosomes from the SSR lines.


(245 KB PDF)

Figure S2. Extraction of the Third Chromosome into the simB w; nt; III Background

(A) Five third chromosomes were extracted for each of the three SSR lines (IG12, IG54, and IG151) and three NSR lines (IG88, IG113, and IG118). Two different P-element inserts (P18 and P40), which are distinguishable by eye color, were used as dominant markers in this cross scheme. The introgressed D. mauritiana material is shown in gray [31] but was irrelevant to our purpose here. There might be recombination in the females, thus flies in G4 are not necessarily all homozygous for the SSR or NSR alleles. However, the majority of the vials from G4 showed sex-ratio for the SSR lines, but only a few vials showed sex-ratio for the NSR lines (B). The overall average clearly indicates that the responsible gene is located on the third chromosome. Several lines from each of the three SSR lines were stably expressing sex-ratio up to G10, but only one from each of the SSR lines (SSR12-2-7, SSR54-2-3, and SSR151-2-10) was kept for further analysis.


(288 KB PDF)

Figure S3. Extraction of the Second Chromosome into the simB w; nt; III Background

(A) Five second chromosomes were extracted for each of the three SSR lines (IG12, IG54, and IG151) and three NSR lines (IG88, IG113, and IG118). In G5, 1/3 of nt+ males should be +/+. The proportion is higher from vials where no nt flies were found in their progeny. If the genes on the second chromosome are responsible for sex-ratio, there should be sex-ratio in the nt+ class as compared to nt class (B). There is no indication of sex-ratio in any of these genotypes, suggesting that no genes on the second chromosome are involved.


(326 KB PDF)

Figure S4. Extraction of the X Chromosome into the CM(1) y w/lzs Background

(A) Five sublines were set up for SSR12 and NSR88 by mating single males to ten CM(1) y w females. Note that sex ratio in this generation was calculated as the proportion of males. In the F1 and subsequent backcrosses, three males were crossed to ten CM(1) y w females. In the F1, BC1, BC5, and BC10 generations, three males from each subline were singly mated to three w; e virgins, and the sex ratios of their progeny were scored (B). The X chromosome clearly does not differ between SSR12 and NSR88 with respect to sex ratio.


(271 KB PDF)

Figure S5. Mapping the Gene on the Third Chromosome

(A) In all crosses, females are at the left-hand side. Crosses G1–G3 were set up en masse (10–12 pairs of virgin males and females). Cross G4 was set up by singly mating to three sim2 virgin females. In G3, males and females of all the 16 possible genotypes of the four markers were mated. In G4, some males are heterozygous for some markers, whereas their phenotype is not distinguishable from wild-type homozygotes. Because the target gene (*) is recessive, homozygote of closer “+” markers will have a higher chance of expressing sex-ratio. A total of 1342 males were tested. Region surrounding pe is thereby implicated with gene affecting sex-ratio (B).


(284 KB PDF)

Figure S6. The 2-P Mapping Scheme

(A) The mapping target is determined by its association with either of the two P-elements, whose eye color phenotypes are easy to distinguish from each other and from flies with both P-elements. The sex-ratio phenotype of each recombinant was tested by complementation with SSR12-2-7 that is homozygous for the mapping target, a recessive loss-of-function suppressor (*). The two P inserts and the region of introgressed D. mauritiana of each 2-P lines are shown in Figure 1B. Recombinants with either (like P40 or P38) or both (like 2P10) P inserts host the loss-of-function allele (*) if k > 0.5 (B). Clearly, the target (*) is localized in between P40 and P38, an interval of ~2,700 kb, as estimated by determining the exact P-element insertion sites through inverse PCR (Araripe L, Eckstrand N, Hartl DL, Tao Y, unpublished data).


(286 KB PDF)

Table S1. Sex Ratio Tested for Various Genotypes


(97 KB DOC)

Table S2. New ASO Markers Developed in this Study


(116 KB DOC)

Table S3. ASO Probes in the Last 7-kb Region of Fine Mapping


(56 KB DOC)

Table S4. Viability from Egg to Adult


(58 KB DOC)

Text S1. A Recessive sex-ratio Suppressor on the Third Chromosome


(43 KB DOC)

Text S2. Relevant Primers Used


(20 KB DOC)

Text S3. Transcripts of Nmy[sim2041] and nmy[sim1427]


(30 KB DOC)

Accession Numbers

All sequences have been deposited in the GenBank (​x.html) database and have been assigned the accession numbers EF565211–EF565217.


We thank Andrew G. Clark for the original sex-ratio stocks and David Begun and Jerry Coyne for some other stocks that made this research possible; Justin Blumenstiel, Andy Clark, Steve Frank, Sarah Kingan, John Lucchesi, Collin Meiklejohn, Allen Orr, Robert Trivers, Jianming Zhang, and members of the Hartl lab for numerous stimulating discussions related to issues covered in this article; Bernado Carvalho for help to access Brazilian sources of literature; and Nathan Eckstrand, Kalsang Namgyal, and Ivan Nurminsky for technical support. We are grateful to Laurent Keller and two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly help us to improve the manuscript. YT is grateful to Louise Trakimas of the Electron Microscopy Facility in Harvard Medical School for her guidance during the TEM study and to William M. Gelbart and Hans Hofmann for allowing him use of their microscopes.

Author Contributions

YT, JPM, and DLH conceived the research. YT, JPM, LA, and YK performed the experiments. YT and JPM analyzed the data. YT and DLH wrote the paper.


  1. 1. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. A complete variorium edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 318 p.
  2. 2. Edwards AWF (2000) Carl Düsing (1884) on The Regulation of the Sex-Ratio. Theor Pop Biol 58: 255–257.
  3. 3. Shaw RF, Mohler JD (1953) The selective significance of the sex ratio. Am Nat 87: 337–342.
  4. 4. Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156: 477–488.
  5. 5. Bull JJ, Charnov EL (1988) How fundamental are Fisherian sex ratios? In: Harvey PH, Partridge L, editors. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 97–135.
  6. 6. Jaenike J (2001) Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 25–49.
  7. 7. Edwards AWF (1961) The population genetics of “sex-ratio” in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity 16: 291–304.
  8. 8. Crow JF (1991) Why is Mendelian segregation so exact? BioEssays 13: 305–312.
  9. 9. Werren JH, Beukeboom LW (1998) Sex determination, sex ratios, and genetic conflict. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29: 233–261.
  10. 10. Cosmides LM, Tooby J (1981) Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. J Theor Biol 89: 83–129.
  11. 11. Hurst LD, Pomiankowski A (1991) Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 128: 841–858.
  12. 12. Frank SA (1991) Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 45: 262–267.
  13. 13. Tao Y, Hartl DL (2003) Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 57: 2580–2598.
  14. 14. Orr HA, Irving S (2005) Segregation distortion in hybrids between the Bogota and USA subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 169: 671–682.
  15. 15. Tao Y, Hartl DL, Laurie CC (2001) Sex-ratio segregation distortion associated with reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 13183–13188.
  16. 16. Yang Y-Y, Lin F-J, Chang H-y (2004) Sex ratio distortion in hybrids of Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta. Zool Stud 43: 622–628.
  17. 17. Faulhaber SH (1967) An abnormal sex ratio in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 56: 189–213.
  18. 18. De Magalhães LE, Roveroni IM, Campos SHA (1985) Occurrence of the sex-ratio trait in natural populations of Drosophila simulans in Brazil. Rev Brasil Genet 8: 449–456.
  19. 19. Merçot H, Atlan A, Jacques M, Montchamp-Moreau C (1995) Sex-ratio distortion in Drosophila simulans: co-occurence of a meiotic drive and a suppressor of drive. J Evol Biol 8: 283–300.
  20. 20. Dermitzakis ET, Masly JP, Waldrip HM, Clark AG (2000) Non-Mendelian segregation of sex chromosomes in heterospecific Drosophila males. Genetics 154: 687–694.
  21. 21. Cazemajor M, Landré C, Montchamp-Moreau C (1997) The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: genetic analysis of distortion and suppression. Genetics 147: 635–642.
  22. 22. Montchamp-Moreau C, Ogereau D, Chaminade N, Colard A, Aulard S (2006) Organization of the sex-ratio meiotic drive region in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 174: 1365–1371.
  23. 23. Derome N, Métayer K, Montchamp-Moreau C, Veuille M (2004) Signature of selective sweep associated with the evolution of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 166: 1357–1366.
  24. 24. Atlan A, Capillon C, Derome N, Couvet D, Montchamp-Moreau C (2003) The evolution of autosomal suppressors of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans. Genetica 117: 47–58.
  25. 25. Atlan A, Merçot H, Landre C, Montchamp-Moreau C (1997) The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: geographical distribution of distortion and resistance. Evolution 51: 1886–1895.
  26. 26. Montchamp-Moreau C, Cazemajor M (2002) Sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans: variation in segregation ratio of X Chromosomes from a natural population. Genetics 162: 1221–1231.
  27. 27. Montchamp-Moreau C, Ginhoux V, Atlan A (2001) The Y chromosomes of Drosophila simulans are highly polymorphic for their ability to suppress sex-ratio drive. Evolution 55: 728–737.
  28. 28. Jutier D, Derome N, Montchamp-Moreau C (2004) The sex-ratio trait and its evolution in Drosophila simulans: a comparative approach. Genetica 120: 87–99.
  29. 29. Cazemajor M, Joly D, Montchamp-Moreau C (2000) Sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans is related to equational non-disjunction of the Y chromosome. Genetics 154: 229–236.
  30. 30. Montchamp-Moreau C, Joly D (1997) Abnormal spermiogenesis is associated with the X-linked sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans. Heredity 79: 24–30.
  31. 31. Tao Y, Chen S, Hartl DL, Laurie CC (2003) Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. I. Differential accumulation of hybrid male sterility effects on the X and autosomes. Genetics 164: 1383–1397.
  32. 32. Tao Y, Araripe L, Kingan SB, Ke Y, Xiao H, et al. (2007) A sex-ratio system in Drosophila simulans. II: An X-linked distorter. PLoS Biol 5(11): e293. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050293.
  33. 33. Chaboissier M-C, Finnegan D, Bucheton A (2000) Retrotransposition of the I factor, a non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon of Drosophila, generates tandem repeats at the 3' end. Nucleic Acid Res 28: 2467–2472.
  34. 34. Luan DD, Korman MH, Jakubczak JL, Eickbush TH (1993) Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell 72: 595–605.
  35. 35. Esnault C, Maestre J, Heidmann T (2000) Human LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes. Nat Genet 24: 363–367.
  36. 36. Tokuyasu KT, Peacock WJ, Hardy RW (1972) Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization Process. Z Zelorsch 124: 479–506.
  37. 37. Tokuyasu KT, Peacock WJ, Hardy RW (1972) Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Coiling process. Z Zelorsch 127: 492–525.
  38. 38. Tokuyasu KT (1974) Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Nuclear transformation. J Ultrastruct Res 48: 284–303.
  39. 39. Stanley HP, Bowan JT, Romrell LJ, Reed SC, Wilkinson RF (1972) Fine structure of normal spermatid differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. J Ultrastruct Res 41: 433–466.
  40. 40. Tokuyasu KT (1975) Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. VI. Significance of “onion” nebenkern formation. J Ultrastruct Res 53: 93–112.
  41. 41. Fuller M (1993) Spermatogenesis. In: Martinez-Arias A, Bate M, editors. The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 71–147.
  42. 42. Toro MA, Charlesworth B (1982) An attempt to detect genetic variation in sex ratio in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 49: 199–209.
  43. 43. Hanks GD (1965) Are deviant sex ratios in normal strains of Drosophila caused by aberrant segregation? Genetics 52: 259–266.
  44. 44. Reed FA, Reeves RG, Aquadro CF (2005) Evidence of susceptibility and resistance to cryptic X-linked meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59: 1280–1291.
  45. 45. Baker BS, Carpenter ATC (1972) Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71: 255–286.
  46. 46. Novitski E, Hanks GD (1961) Analysis of irradiated Drosophila populations for meiotic drive. Nature 190: 989–990.
  47. 47. Barker JSF, Moth JJ (2001) Linkage maps of D. simulans: An update of Sturtevant (1929) with additional loci. Dros Inf Serv 84: 205–206.
  48. 48. Ramamurthy G, Alfert M, Stern C (1980) Ultrastructural studies on spermatogenesis in a sex-ratio-mutant strain of Drosophila simulans. Am J Anat 157: 205–219.
  49. 49. Burt A, Trivers R (2006) Genes in conflict. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press. 602 p.
  50. 50. Temin RG, Ganetzky B, Powers PA, Lyttle TW, Pimpinelli S, et al. (1990) Segregation Distorter (SD) in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic and molecular analysis. Am Nat 137: 287–331.
  51. 51. Lyon MF (2003) Transmission ratio distortion in mice. Annu Rev Gent 37: 393–408.
  52. 52. Varandas FR, Sampaio MC, Carvalho AB (1997) Heritability of sexual proportion in experimental sex-ratio populations of Drosophila mediopunctata. Heredity 79: 104–112.
  53. 53. Vaz SC, Carvalho AB (2004) Evolution of autosomal suppression of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila. Genetics 166: 265–277.
  54. 54. Jaenike J (1996) Sex-ratio meiotic drive in the Drosophila quinaria group. Am Nat 148: 237–254.
  55. 55. Jaenike J (1999) Suppression of sex-ratio meiotic drive and the maintenance of Y-chromosome polymorphism in Drosophila. Evolution 53: 164–174.
  56. 56. Hauschteck-Jungen E (1990) Postmating reproductive isolation and modification of the “sex ratio” trait in Drosophila subobscura induced by the sex chromosome gene arrangement A2+3+5+7. Genetica 83: 31–44.
  57. 57. Stalker HD (1961) The genetic systems modifying meiotic drive in Drosophila paramelanica. Genetics 46: 177–202.
  58. 58. Carvalho AB, Vaz SC, Klaczko LB (1997) Polymorphism for Y-linked suppressors of sex-ratio in two natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata. Genetics 146: 891–902.
  59. 59. Carvalho AB, Klaczko LB (1993) Autosomal suppressors of sex-ratio in Drosophila mediopunctata. Heredity 71: 546–551.
  60. 60. Carvalho AB, Klaczko LB (1994) Y-linked suppressors of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila mediopunctata. Heredity 73: 573–579.
  61. 61. Policansky D, Dempsey B (1978) Modifiers and “sex-ratio” in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 32: 922–924.
  62. 62. Wu C-I (1983) The fate of autosomal modifiers of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila and other sex-linked meiotic drive systems. Theor Pop Biol 24: 121–135.
  63. 63. Babcock CS, Anderson WW (1996) Molecular evolution of the sex-ratio inversion complex in Drosophila pseudoobscura: analysis of the Esterase-5 gene region. Mol Biol Evol 13: 297–308.
  64. 64. Hurst LD (1992) Is Stellate a relict meiotic driver? Genetics 130: 229–230.
  65. 65. Hurst LD (1996) Further evidence consistent with Stellate's involvement in meiotic drive. Genetics 142: 641–643.
  66. 66. Aravin AA, Klenov MS, Vagin VV, Bentignies F, Cavalli G, et al. (2004) Dissection of a natural RNA silencing process in the Drosophila melanogaster germ line. Mol Cell Biol 24: 6742–6750.
  67. 67. Aravin AA, Naumova NM, Tulin AV, Vagin VV, Rozovsky YM, et al. (2001) Double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of genomic tandem repeats and transposable elements in the D. melanogaster germline. Curr Biol 11: 1017–1027.
  68. 68. Tokuyasu KT, Peacock WJ, Hardy RW (1977) Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Effects of Segregation Distorter (SD) chromosome. J Ultrastruct Res 58: 96–107.
  69. 69. Merrill C, Bayraktaroglu L, Kusano A, Ganetzky B (1999) Truncated RanGAP encoded by the Segregation Distorter locus of Drosophila. Science 283: 1742–1745.
  70. 70. Kusano A, Staber C, Ganetzky B (2001) Nuclear mislocalization of enzymatically active RanGAP causes segregation distortion in Drosophila. Dev Cell 1: 351–361.
  71. 71. Kusano A, Staber C, Ganetzky B (2002) Segregation distortion induced by wild-type RanGAP in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 6866–6870.
  72. 72. Ohrt T, Merkle D, Birkenfeld K, Echeverri CJ, Schwille P (2006) In situ fluorescence analysis demonstrates active siRNA exclusion from the nucleus by Exportin 5. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 1369–1380.
  73. 73. Wu C-I, Lyttle TW, Wu M-L, Lin G-F (1988) Association between a satellite DNA sequence and the Responder of Segregation Distorter in D. melanogaster. Cell 54: 179–189.
  74. 74. Pal-Bhadra M, Leibovitch BS, Gandi SG, Rao M, Bhadra U, et al. (2004) Heterochromatic silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science 303: 669–672.
  75. 75. Saito K, Nashida KM, Mori T, Kawamura Y, Miyoshi K, et al. (2006) Specific association of Piwi with rasiRNAs derived from retrotransposon and heterochromatic regions in the Drosophila genome. Genes Dev 20: 2214–2222.
  76. 76. Novitski E, Peacock WJ, Engel J (1965) Cytological basis of “sex ratio” in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Science 148: 516–517.
  77. 77. Peacock WJ, Miklos GLG, Goodchild DJ (1975) Sex chromosome meiotic drive systems in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Abnormal spermatid development in males with a heterochromatin-deficient X chromosome (sc4sc8). Genetics 79: 613–634.
  78. 78. Hauschteck-Jungen E, Maurer B (1976) Sperm dysfunction in sex-ratio males of Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 46: 459–477.
  79. 79. McKee BD, Wilhelm K, Merrill C, Ren X-j (1998) Male sterility and meiotic drive associated with sex chromosome rearrangement in Drosophila: role of X-Y pairing. Genetics 149: 143–155.
  80. 80. Jones CD (1998) The genetic basis of Drosophila sechellia's resistance to a host plant toxin. Genetics 149: 1898–1908.
  81. 81. Jones CD, Orr HA (1998) Test of a Drosophila simulans balancer and a remapping of chromosome 3. Dros Inf Serv 81: 137.
  82. 82. Sturtevant AH, Novitski E (1941) The homologies of the chromosome elements in the genus Drosophila. Genetics 26: 517–541.
  83. 83. Fabrizio JJ, Hime G, Lemmon SK, Bazinet C (1998) Genetic dissection of sperm individualization in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 125: 1833–1843.