Advertisement
Correspondence

An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem

  • Marc Hauser mail,

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mdh@wjh.harvard.edu

    X
  • Ernst Fehr
  • Published: April 17, 2007
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050107

Reader Comments (21)

Post a new comment on this article

Great idea

Posted by plosbiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT

Author: Björn Brembs
Position: Independent Researcher
Institution: Freie Universität Berlin
E-mail: bjoern@brembs.net
Submitted Date: April 18, 2007
Published Date: April 18, 2007
This comment was originally posted as a “Reader Response” on the publication date indicated above. All Reader Responses are now available as comments.

I think this is a great idea!It may turn out that it is not practical, but I think it's definitely worth a try.
I volunteer as academic editor for PLoS One and would support the effort.

No competing interests declared.